Each case of conviction itself is a legal-FSK truth within the specific legal FSK.
Investigators had collected loads of related physical and other evidences, but it was the DNA evidences that nailed them after >30 years as cold cases.
Note there are many such cold cases of serious murders and other crimes which were resolved CONCLUSIVELY beyond reasonable doubts many years after the crime, based on scientific-FSK DNA evidences.
From the report above it was the DNA evidences that nailed the cases with the various convictions, i.e. the legal case.DNA testing and a genealogy database reportedly provided police with a breakthrough in the infamous Golden State Killer case.
Joseph James DeAngelo, 72, was arrested Wednesday by the Sacramento Sheriff on charges of murder. Police link the alleged Golden State Killer to 12 homicides, 45 rapes, and 120 home invasions in the 1970s and ’80s in California.
Investigators sequenced DNA from crime scenes that had been stored for decades and plugged the genetic profile of the suspected assailant into an online genealogy database. Officers found distant relatives of DeAngelo’s and traced their DNA to his front door, The New York Times reported.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/scie ... cience-spd
The DNA evidences [scientific-FSK truths] in these cases are the critical and significant evidence which I believe can be rated with a weightage of 90/100 in convincing the jury and confirming the conclusion of the conviction.
So what we have with the above legal-FSK truth,
is that the scientific-FSK truths [of 90% weightage] were input into a legal-FSK to enable the emergence of legal-FSK-truth via a legal FSK.
Agree?
So what is wrong with,
scientific-FSK truths of 90% weightage being input into a moral FSK to enable the emergence of moral-FSK truths via a moral FSK??