An intelligent person would not find your definition, pasted in, as a valuable contribution.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sun Feb 28, 2021 3:29 amAt least you are countering something here.Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Feb 27, 2021 10:54 amYou would have to make valid agrued points rather than just empty assertions.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sat Feb 27, 2021 4:44 am
You are complaining about yourself, i.e. your responses are most empty of content; most of the time it is merely brushing off the arguments of others.
For your own intellectual sanity sake, you must provide well justified arguments to counter why my points are wrong.
You bandy words as if they are unproblematic.
Take "normal" for example. Your entire opinion rests on the meaning of that word, yet you seem to think it is meaningful.
What is the problem with my use of 'normal', note;
...
So what is the problem with my use of the term 'normal'.
It is tautological and question begging
I have told you that is false.
No sane person, free from any mental disorder would want to kill oneself; no normal person would want to kill oneself.
LOL
I am 100% confident whatever counters with your supporting views and references you throw at me, I will be able to explain it away and that my claim is rational 99% of the time.
Put your system to this question.
Is it moral to hunt foxes?