This supposed 'inherent moral drive' is the same fiction dressed up with a different name. That we may be 'driven' or 'programmed' to behave in certain ways has no inherent or intrinsic moral significance - no 'good' or 'evil' implication. And that's why, if men were 'driven' or 'programmed' to rape out-group females, that wouldn't make it morally right or good to do so.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Tue Mar 02, 2021 5:21 amWhy not practical?Sculptor wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 2:57 pmThis is not a practical answer.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Mon Mar 01, 2021 7:00 am
You are so ignorant and blinded when I have already answered your question plus with supporting; i.e.
The Samurai Bushido would likely have a 51/100 moral defectiveness in their program of not-to-kill-humans, thus will kill their enemies where there is a need to.
Note the my supporting explanations to the above.
No one could take this answer and understand where your all encompassing moral algorithm stood on this matter.
It looks like your moral system is not fit for purpose.
It is a fact there are no more Samurai Bushido in modern Japan.
The tradition somehow crept into the Japanese Mafia where killing was rampant.
At present the Japanese Government has got rid of the Japanese Mafia and there is no more mafia killings and tortures.
This is evident the inherent moral drive [moral fact] had reduced the moral-defective in this aspect of the Japanese society.
But - I forget. You can't handle the point of counter-factuals in exposing the fallacy of an argument. Ho hum.