Arguments don't prove anything.
That's philosophical dogma.
I asked whether you like it or not. I didn't ask your opinion.
What gives you the preference to put yourself above others? Anybody looks like you if s/he is in your place.
Everything is situational. What you need is not an argument but a true moral principle that helps you to see and derive whether a good (what you like) or evil (what you dislike) act is right or wrong in a situation.
Do you have an argument to prove the dumbness of my comment?
From the legal perspective,Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:14 pmHumans are very good at asking questions.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:19 amWhat is wrong with genocide?
To even ask such a question is
You are definitely not a human being.
Most are good at answering them.
I'll ask you again.
What do YOU think is wrong with genocide?
Laws are culturally subjective.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sat Mar 13, 2021 6:27 amFrom the legal perspective,Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:14 pmHumans are very good at asking questions.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:19 am
What is wrong with genocide?
To even ask such a question is
You are definitely not a human being.
Most are good at answering them.
I'll ask you again.
What do YOU think is wrong with genocide?
How naive of you.Genocide is wrong because it is a contemptible crime in all sovereign nations and The International Criminal Court
https://www.icc-cpi.int/
The ICC is objective and regardless of whatever opinion one or a group has, whichever group commit genocide [as defined] they are punished.
Opinon
From the moral perspective,
ALL humans are obligated to align with the moral standard,
Opinon'no human ought to kill humans'
Opinontherefore genocide is not in alignment with the above moral standard.
The above moral standard is an objective moral fact verified and justified empirically and philosophically within a credible moral FSK.
But empathy to protect your own race can be stronger.
The other point is empathy function is inherent is all normal human beings.
Genocide is a contradiction to empathy.
opinion.Thus if you do not condemn genocide, you are not a normal human being.
You ask about 'wrongness' so I am giving you the literal answer.Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Mar 13, 2021 3:14 pmLaws are culturally subjective.
That is why genocide has been carried out in so many countries despite laws.
Worse still, there have been many countries who have enacted laws with the specific purpose to commit genocide.
Even the USA.
You are the ignorant one.How naive of you.Genocide is wrong because it is a contemptible crime in all sovereign nations and The International Criminal Court
https://www.icc-cpi.int/
The ICC is objective and regardless of whatever opinion one or a group has, whichever group commit genocide [as defined] they are punished.
Are you insisting scientific facts are opinions?OpinionFrom the moral perspective,
ALL humans are obligated to align with the moral standard,
'no human ought to kill humans'
therefore genocide is not in alignment with the above moral standard.
The above moral standard is an objective moral fact verified and justified empirically and philosophically within a credible moral FSK.
That is where you are ignorant.But empathy to protect your own race can be stronger.The other point is empathy function is inherent is all normal human beings.
Genocide is a contradiction to empathy.
FALSEVeritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 4:32 amYou ask about 'wrongness' so I am giving you the literal answer.
But what is legal is not morality-proper.
We are talking about what is objective. Not what is obviously culturally and historically contingent.You are the ignorant one.How naive of you.Genocide is wrong because it is a contemptible crime in all sovereign nations and The International Criminal Court
https://www.icc-cpi.int/
The ICC is objective and regardless of whatever opinion one or a group has, whichever group commit genocide [as defined] they are punished.
The ICC is objective within its defined framework and system.
Are you insisting scientific facts are opinions?OpinionFrom the moral perspective,
ALL humans are obligated to align with the moral standard,
'no human ought to kill humans'
therefore genocide is not in alignment with the above moral standard.
The above moral standard is an objective moral fact verified and justified empirically and philosophically within a credible moral FSK.
What are verified and justified moral facts are similar to verified and justified scientific facts within the scientific FSK.
That is where you are ignorant.But empathy to protect your own race can be stronger.The other point is empathy function is inherent is all normal human beings.
Genocide is a contradiction to empathy.
The drive to protect one's own race is tribalism [us versus them], not based on empathy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribalism
In any tribalistic driven genocide the propensity for empathy is suppressed.
Empathy is generic and is related to the individual human being regardless of race.
Genocide is a contradiction to empathy.
Thus if you do not condemn genocide, you are not a normal individual human being.