macrocosm and ethics of morality

[pulcinella]

Assuming an experiential possibility of the possible microcosm tending to the infinity of the potentialities of the "objectual and subjective" actuality, intuitible as a point without boundaries by the infinite possible centralities (these not necessarily concerning this totality) the dialogue between a subject-object and a form it can lead to the infinite presentation of the particularity, a relationship postulated by the real truth in the momentary "apparent" of the presence of generality in their manifestations.
The essence of the conscious relation of immediacy is emanated from the continuous presentation of forms, declined according to the participation of the being in extrinsecation.
If, for example, as a key principle of real truth of the existence of the existence stipulated by the infinite phenomenology in each of its variations, just as the actual provides in itself the harmony of the existence of the Possibility in extrinsecation, the good is placed as ramifying of the optimal relations - or right - relationships, since the existence itself of the existence of the possibility of the movement of the infinite and its particularities is good, the good would be a continuous realization of oneself, a movement that is one of the cornerstones of infinity, as of rest would be the relative postulate and essential change of the good of every microcosm, this understood as a relation of the contingent relations to the incidence of this relational group.



On the Macrocosm and its microcosms

The Good of Being is the being of Being. The first possibility of fragmentation of this macrocosm is the absence, the possibility of being absent from the being of Being, therefore the presence of Being declined as being absent is the being of being absent: such is the presence of 'Being there of Being in being absent. The existence of the absent objectivity is therefore shared by the initial constant of the Good, as the good of being absent is the existence of being absent.
The being of the Good is therefore the subsistence of the existence of Being, in being there of presence and absence. This combination of the existence of Being present as present and absent leads to the distinction of Being in different peculiar manifestations of itself described in relation to specificity, or branching, balanced by the existence of Being, manifest in presence and absence.
The particular being is therefore described by the existence of Being in its own objectifying presence, in a tendential manifestation, this relativized by the becoming of the specific unity of the moment-duration relative to one's own relationships.
The good of the particular being is therefore the being of the ramificant and ramified being in the microcosm, which tends to its presence in the relationships that pervade it in the moment-duration. The being of the microcosm is the existence of the presence of Being and of its absence in the succession of the particular, described by the existence of Being in participation in the existence of absence and presence, or in its own extrinsecations.
When the Being of the Good is the being of the microcosm, since the Good is subsistence of the existence of the Being, every relation of its extrinsic shares the existence of the existence of its fractioned in tendential unity of the specific optimal relations of their field of impact. These relativity of unity discerns the incidence relative to one's own sphere of relationships. The non-accident and the non-accident remain as the other in the synthesis, implemented in the moment-duration, the latter objectified in the specific manifestation, which finds a solution in the good, or presence in itself, implemented in the relative for itself, there being the absence of the presence in the relative for itself.
When two microcosms in relationship do not recognize themselves as the only microcosm, the relationship between the two follows the same dynamics of presence and absence of being there, or rather it establishes which fractions of the two microcosms enter phenomenologically in relation, this relative to the presence of the specific good of the moment-duration of the extrinsication of the Good in the microcosm of the relation in tendency presence of the microcosms in their partial or unitary relation, always according to the tendential optimal relation.
This specific asset will be the sharing of the incident relations of a microcosm and of the mutual absences described by the existence of the biunivocal absence of the non participated in gravitational action.

[Skip]

Did you say something?

[pulcinella]

There are perhaps errors of transcription still, especially between Being and being here. To paraphrase, one could take the whole as a consequential pact between the centrality of Being and the centrality of Good, extrinsic in their being here by ramifications dedicated to re-establishing the initial pact in the specific part and in its relations.

[Skip]

And your question or topic of discussion?

[pulcinella]

The question is the search for the possible relevance of the topic of the discussion in a common conversation, the topic of the discussion is what can be believed to good in philosophy, beyond the dichotomies not good