Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Nov 27, 2020 7:31 pm
No..."as you suppose." Not "as we all know." The majority of people still believe morality is objective....
Yes yes God said so and all that. Obviously by we, I meant people with somewhat functioning brains.
as do you, if you think " making self-serving shit up" ought to be classified as "a morally disgusting practice."
See? You can't even keep your own story straight
You are writing such total non sequiturs, it's remarkable.
Ought I not to think it is? You seem to think I ought not...
It's difficult to deal with words that can have not one, but at least two meanings huh. Depending on context, for example subjective vs objective.
Essentially, that is correct. For "morality" can definitionally never be solipsistic, since it always implies an appeal for agreement from others. After all, what does the statement "I'm a moral person" mean, if you are not expecting any other person ever to have to agree with you about that? For then your claim reduces to nothing more than "I choose..." or "I do not choose." And being a subjectivist, you have to assume that no other person has to agree with your choice or approve of it.
That's not moral, and not immoral (unless morality IS objective, in which case it is immoral). But definitionally, it's amoral...meaning, "devoid of any moral status or content."
So subjectivism is inherently amoral at least, immoral at worst.
You are probably from another planet, so you may not be aware that it's possible for multiple people to share an opinion.
There you go again. You can't stop being an objectivist for even one message.
See above. I don't even have to put in any effort, you are just burying yourself.