A scientific definition of good and bad

Should you think about your duty, or about the consequences of your actions? Or should you concentrate on becoming a good person?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Posts: 269
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 12:30 am
Location: Metropolitan-Oslo, Norway, Europe

Re: A scientific definition of good and bad

Post by Necromancer » Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:28 am

In providing scientific definition of good and bad, it seems that bio-values are a more scientific account than that of the OP, one that even Sam Harris can approve of. That is, lower bio-values suggest wrongful action and steady or higher (or simply high) bio-values suggest rightful action.

There's a slight, little normative to it such as "Act so that your bio-value remains at current level or even gains a higher value".

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests