Are you taking the piss?
... and then you quoted me. Don't be obtuse. You really do get pathetically fatuous when stuff isn't working for you.As I was about to submit this post I heard from the Thought Police who accused me of being "evasive," "unable to recognize limits," and accused me of putting forth an argument to the effect of :
Again... you demanded an exact definition from me.prof wrote: ↑Sun May 27, 2018 9:35 pmAnd are you implying that what you write is not 'self-serving'? Or is this a case of "the pot calling the kettle black"?FlashDangerpants wrote: Your definition of Ethics is self serving and incomplete, also as expected.
Of course it's 'incomplete.' I'd rather be congruent (coherent) than complete; one cannot be both at once, as Kurt Godel demonstrates.
You owe me an exact definition, not a half of a starting point for further discussion.
You insisted on removing vagueness and ambiguity, but now you are pretending you didn't.