Logik wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 5:54 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 22, 2019 5:47 pm
What uncertainty....same thing different variation...what I have been arguing all along.
Also. You are coming into the computational way of thinking without even realising it.
The phrase instance of information
refers to the specific instantiation of information (identity, form, essence) that is associated with the being of a particular example of a thing. (This allows for the reference to separate instances of information that happen to share identical patterns.)
You are human.
I am human.
We are different humans.
Rational. Computation is equivalent to a strict mechanical quantitative analysis where the concept of "infinity" (further reflected within the concept of "quality" which is ignored) is viewed as a false axiom in the respect it is an incomplete or indeterminate solution.
Rationality inverts this, by observed the balance of both quantity and quality, and necessitating "infinity" as both a defined state as self-evident but an answer in itself through the aquisition of quality as part of the answer. Your computation, premised in the reduction of a finite truth to a further finite truth is self defeating in the face of its own reflection in the modern scientific method where one "fact" is inevitable negated given a length of time for a further scientific fact.
This appears anti-rational/scientific at first, but this process of individuation (manifestation of multiplicity) is an underlying rational foundation of measurement and observes you are just running a treadmill like a rat. Movement towards "one" truth and "many" truths is the fundamentally problem, which is solved in accords to a synthesis of both. In simpler terms the world is an extension of how we measure it, it is an extension of our perceptual judgements and the focus on material needs "only" results in a fracturing process where the material needs will inevitably never be met (given a length of time) due to moral corruption induced by the neglect of the human capacity of reason as an extension of the infinite.
This divergence, convergence is strictly a spatial axiom which can be observed as extending into type theory but is not limited to it. Your type theory exists because of "space" and the cyclical nature of the "black box" calculative method is strictly determined in accords to the spatial axiom of circularity.