Yes, there is no absolute definition of evil and it does not matter all at.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 4:52 amIf there is no absolute then:Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 4:31 amI am not implying quarks are the sole foundation.
There is no absolute sole foundation.
The looping is not in a circle but a spiral like the Yin-Yang complementarity and hermeneutics.Actually it is not a question of rhetoric, if we are composed of quarks and we are observing quarks then by default the quarks are looping back on themselves. Physics does not like this because they believe it negates progress (when it really doesn't if the loop expands or contracts) and it necessitates universal forms not limited to physics alone.
The looping nature of empirical phenomenon leads to inherent consistency in forms where the question comes: which came first form or matter? Under relativity we are left with the necessity form is not limited to matter but emliricists are angered by an pure reason to being because it gives a sense of incompletion to there beliefs.
Note the Buddhist's "Form Is Emptiness, Emptiness Is Form."
1) There is no absolute definition of evil, as you argue.
2) "No absolute" comtradicts itself as it must be an absolute statement if it is to be truth.
3) To negate a positive (absolute) requires a positive to exist.
What matters and is critical point here is empirical evil.
What we need to address are the real terrible evil and violent acts of genocides, mass murders, mass rapes, child sexual abuse, tortures, crimes, etc.
It may seem like an absolute, but it is at most a relative absolute, like absolute temperature. These are not the absolutely absolute which we are zooming into.If it negates itself into a further definitive statement, and so on and so forth, the continuum of the relativistic definitions is an absolute.
What is of concern with the absolutely absolute is its rhetoric and deception into the idea of a 'real' absolutely absolute God which inspires SOME evil prone believers to commit terrible real evil and violent acts which are empirically evident.
I am unable to follow your points above and I cannot sense anything critical to the point that could lead to real evil acts that is of great concern to humanity.A) A spiral still necessitates a linear movement from a point 0 towards a point 0, and in these respects goes back to the "lines as circle" thread. This is considering the loop, if observed from the side, eventually results in a line as a quantum frequency.
B) The premise of the spiral movement (the origin curve) moves in a circular manner through the foundation point. The same occurs with the interior point. The spiral is the circularity of points in points. This will have to be explained further.
C) If viewing the spiral amidst any of specified number of cycles, regardless of one's place in the continuum, the spiral maintains the same proportionality and a spiral of "x" length in position "a" will be the same if "x" length in position "b,c,d," or any other position.
D) THE arguments can be expanded further but provide foundations for constants.
This looping cycle is premised in circularity.
The point, line and circle exist through eachother as 1 in 3 and 3 in 1 and are inseparable. They are the foundations for all reason and consciousness and reflect through the various belief systems that relegate divinity as triadic and one. (I will have to post sources for this argument)