Utilitarianism and Ethics
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 5:16 am
The basis of utilitarianism philosophy (greatest-happiness principle) is a similar school of thought to the Epicureans. However utilitarianism is remarkably different in so much as it advocates an element of totalitarianism/authoritarianism to justify the means if need be, as Mill argued: "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any other member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.” So taking this particular quote into context with utilitarianism’s founding principle; am I correct in understanding that if my happiness is being restricted by another's political (social) position, which is causing me harm (mental or physical), then force should be legally exercised?
In my view, utilitarianism has limitations depending on the timescales involved. A question: How can a perceived social construct like 'equality and equity' be beneficial for society if it ultimately may lead to negative outcomes under certain scenarios like; If it makes people happy to allow intellectually disabled people to procreate, drive cars, or become professors at university, under the umbrella of 'equality and equity', then how would this translate into productive benefits for society which has derived from happiness?
Just for clarification, I am not advocating any particular ethical position here. I am just interested to know how a utilitarian reconciles such ethical issues.
In my view, utilitarianism has limitations depending on the timescales involved. A question: How can a perceived social construct like 'equality and equity' be beneficial for society if it ultimately may lead to negative outcomes under certain scenarios like; If it makes people happy to allow intellectually disabled people to procreate, drive cars, or become professors at university, under the umbrella of 'equality and equity', then how would this translate into productive benefits for society which has derived from happiness?
Just for clarification, I am not advocating any particular ethical position here. I am just interested to know how a utilitarian reconciles such ethical issues.