Bill Wiltrack wrote: βSat Sep 16, 2017 5:16 pm
We all die. - So yeah, I speak for all of
us.
You might
want to and even
try to speak for all of us. But
you can ONLY truly speak for you.
By the way, you do NOT speak for Me because I do NOT die. But then again you do NOT yet know how to answer that question of Who am I? So, I do NOT expect you to even begin speak for Me at all accurately yet.
Bill Wiltrack wrote: βSat Sep 16, 2017 5:16 pmWe all have a thirst for knowledge. - So yeah, I speak for all of
us.
Who is the 'we' you are referring to, and trying to speak for, here?
Your answer to this clarifying question, and My consequent following clarifying questions, might shine some light on if you really are capable of speaking for 'all of us' or not.
Bill Wiltrack wrote: βSat Sep 16, 2017 5:16 pmAll normally functioning human beings have an intellectual function. - So yeah, I have the ability to speak for all of
us.
And what EXACTLY is that 'intellectual function', of which you speak of?
Bill Wiltrack wrote: βSat Sep 16, 2017 5:16 pmAt the core of philosophy, real philosophy, are found universal scientific truths.
Is that a indisputable, unambiguous true fact?
Bill Wiltrack wrote: βSat Sep 16, 2017 5:16 pmAt the core of philosophy, real philosophy, is a scientific discipline.
What does 'philosophy' actually mean to you?
And, what is the difference between that and 'real philosophy'?
Bill Wiltrack wrote: βSat Sep 16, 2017 5:16 pmI think I lost
you a while back so, there's really no reason for
you to reply any longer.
Why would you only
think that?
You say you are able to speak for all of us, therefore you should be able to
know for certain if you lost Me or not. If, as you say, you are able to speak for all of us, then tell where or when exactly you lost Me and why you list Me.
If you can speak for Me here, by explaining these things, then you might be able to prove how you can actually speak for Me.
Up to now this was the only sentence I "lost" you, in the sense that I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about here only.
Was this just an attempt at any thing to try to get Me not to respond any more?
If it was, then obviously it was very unsuccessful.
Do you really believe so much in that you can speak for others that you also believe you can also tell us when we can also respond or not?
Like I have implied to you before, you do NOT speak for Me so there is really NO use in even trying. I respond if and when I want to.
If you try to speak for Me and/or try to write statements as though they are absolutely true, then I will more than likely respond to you, with clarifying questions.
Did you mean 'You
are a troll.
Troll!?
If so, then what do you think I am fishing for, from you, by just asking you very simple clarifying questions?
Your answers or non answers will show what I am actually fishing for, which is the truth by the way, and what is the outcome of have philosophy, from My definition of philosophy.
Feel free to
try to and speak for all of us. I, for One, certainly will not try and stop you doing that. In fact I like it if you continue because then I can ask you clarifying questions. The ignorance in your answers so far is already showing what the truth may well hold.
Your further answers, or lack of response, to My clarifying questions will confirm what the actual truth is.
Who or what is the 'we' here?
And, why am I not included in this 'we' now?
When did I not become a part of 'all of us'?
Also, what do you mean by 'gaming'?