Life is a Terminal Illness

[Age]

Well just so you are AWARE, WHEN 'you' GROW UP the 'pain' dissipates, and COMPLETELY by the way.

Easier said than done.

NOT when 'you' learn or know HOW to do 'it' properly AND correctly.

The sensation of Pain cannot be taken out unless the sensing mechanism embedded in a body goes out with it. No body, no pain.

You have OBVIOUSLY MISSED my POINT.

Have you ever noticed that a rusty nail embedded in one's eyeball is a very painful experience? or are you comfortably numb like me.

The 'pain' of CHILDHOOD ABUSE I am TALKING ABOUT.

And, OF COURSE, there is a SENSATION of PAIN when a rusty or CLEAN nail is embedded in an eyeball. But the AMOUNT of 'pain' and/or 'suffering' CAN BE CONTROLLED, MORE SO, the MORE 'one' has GROWN UP and MATURED.

[Age]

How does the Russia/Ukraine conflict define itself, relative to the one singular event?

'Things' like a so-called "russia/ukraine conflict" do NOT define themselves. ONLY human beings 'define' 'things'.

Now, HOW a 'conflict', which was obviously created by, and is between, human beings is relative to the One SINGULAR 'event' IS; there is NO ACTUAL 'separation' in thee One 'event', other than the 'one' created by human beings, of course.

What led UP TO 'this conflict', just like EVERY 'other conflict', is because of an inseparable list of REASONS.

Also, the REASON 'you', human beings, IMAGINE 'this conflict' is separated from ANY 'thing' else is because of the IMAGINED 'line/s' you make up and create.

I invoke the war, because of the inevitable awkwardness of people trying to practice the singularity - or the one singular event - with history, and with the compartmentalization through economics paradigm of reality.

Okay.

Wars are recurrent, I know, but, the Russia war with Ukraine is the ongoing war (the theme of ongoing relating to the one singular event's nature of ongoing being in question), therefore is susceptible to being used

Okay.

You say that only human beings define things, but evolution exists; because evolution has a say, in the process of singularity, it stands to reason that the 2D nature of the Russia/Ukraine war has a say as well, because of the alignment between the conflict and evolution

Okay.

What does the word 'singularity' here MEAN or REFER TO, EXACTLY?

[trokanmariel]

'Things' like a so-called "russia/ukraine conflict" do NOT define themselves. ONLY human beings 'define' 'things'.

Now, HOW a 'conflict', which was obviously created by, and is between, human beings is relative to the One SINGULAR 'event' IS; there is NO ACTUAL 'separation' in thee One 'event', other than the 'one' created by human beings, of course.

What led UP TO 'this conflict', just like EVERY 'other conflict', is because of an inseparable list of REASONS.

Also, the REASON 'you', human beings, IMAGINE 'this conflict' is separated from ANY 'thing' else is because of the IMAGINED 'line/s' you make up and create.



Okay.



Okay.

You say that only human beings define things, but evolution exists; because evolution has a say, in the process of singularity, it stands to reason that the 2D nature of the Russia/Ukraine war has a say as well, because of the alignment between the conflict and evolution

Okay.

What does the word 'singularity' here MEAN or REFER TO, EXACTLY?

Conventional awareness, means that it refers to the assimilation process, in which all data is assimilated together. However, for my own part, the singularity means the act of opposing daylight, because daylight is a representation of time and infinity using the same reality.

[popeye1945]

Well just so you are AWARE, WHEN 'you' GROW UP the 'pain' dissipates, and COMPLETELY by the way.

Easier said than done.

NOT when 'you' learn or know HOW to do 'it' properly AND correctly.

The sensation of Pain cannot be taken out unless the sensing mechanism embedded in a body goes out with it. No body, no pain.

You have OBVIOUSLY MISSED my POINT.

Have you ever noticed that a rusty nail embedded in one's eyeball is a very painful experience? or are you comfortably numb like me.

The 'pain' of CHILDHOOD ABUSE I am TALKING ABOUT.

And, OF COURSE, there is a SENSATION of PAIN when a rusty or CLEAN nail is embedded in an eyeball. But the AMOUNT of 'pain' and/or 'suffering' CAN BE CONTROLLED, MORE SO, the MORE 'one' has GROWN UP and MATURED.

Age,

This is just a scramble of miss quotes. I have no idea who said what you attribute to me.

[Age]

You say that only human beings define things, but evolution exists; because evolution has a say, in the process of singularity, it stands to reason that the 2D nature of the Russia/Ukraine war has a say as well, because of the alignment between the conflict and evolution

Okay.

What does the word 'singularity' here MEAN or REFER TO, EXACTLY?

Conventional awareness, means that it refers to the assimilation process, in which all data is assimilated together.

To me, the word 'singularity' can refer to when ALL physicality is together, infinite compressed. Or, if we want to take the 'singularity' word to refer to an assimilation process, in which ALL data is assimilated together, then okay. This process has ALREADY HAPPENED. But, the explanation for this was only explained later on, AFTER when this is being written. Although this 'singularity' is ALREADY UNDERSTOOD, in the days when this is being written, EXPLAINING it FULLY will come about SOON ENOUGH, to 'you', peoples.

However, for my own part, the singularity means the act of opposing daylight, because daylight is a representation of time and infinity using the same reality.

You appear to use the 'daylight' word in very 'unconventional ways', in the days when this is being written, which is completely fair enough but would you like to expand on and explain further what you mean by the 'daylight' word here?

If no, then WHY NOT?

Now, is the so-called 'act of opposing daylight' have ANY thing AT ALL to just what is commonly called and referred to as 'nighttime'?

And what does 'daylight is a representation of time and infinity' MEAN, to you?

Also, what does 'using the SAME reality', MEAN, or REFER TO, to you?

How many OTHER 'realities' are there, EXACTLY?

To me, 'time' is represented by the act of measuring duration, and, 'infinity' is represented by a never ending distance or expanse. But 'you' are absolutely FREE to have and use your very OWN definitions AND meanings.

[Age]

Easier said than done.

NOT when 'you' learn or know HOW to do 'it' properly AND correctly.

The sensation of Pain cannot be taken out unless the sensing mechanism embedded in a body goes out with it. No body, no pain.

You have OBVIOUSLY MISSED my POINT.

Have you ever noticed that a rusty nail embedded in one's eyeball is a very painful experience? or are you comfortably numb like me.

The 'pain' of CHILDHOOD ABUSE I am TALKING ABOUT.

And, OF COURSE, there is a SENSATION of PAIN when a rusty or CLEAN nail is embedded in an eyeball. But the AMOUNT of 'pain' and/or 'suffering' CAN BE CONTROLLED, MORE SO, the MORE 'one' has GROWN UP and MATURED.

Age,

This is just a scramble of miss quotes.

Okay, of which I will correct the two misquotes. I APOLOGIZE for misquoting you, AND "dontaskme", here.

I have no idea who said what you attribute to me.

Okay. But the hint who it was, was in the first quote, which was attributed to the RIGHT person.

I have CORRECTED my MISTAKE, and AGAIN I APOLOGIZE.

Oh, and by the way, I have CORRECTED your MISQUOTED post here, as well.

[trokanmariel]

Okay.

What does the word 'singularity' here MEAN or REFER TO, EXACTLY?

Conventional awareness, means that it refers to the assimilation process, in which all data is assimilated together.

To me, the word 'singularity' can refer to when ALL physicality is together, infinite compressed. Or, if we want to take the 'singularity' word to refer to an assimilation process, in which ALL data is assimilated together, then okay. This process has ALREADY HAPPENED. But, the explanation for this was only explained later on, AFTER when this is being written. Although this 'singularity' is ALREADY UNDERSTOOD, in the days when this is being written, EXPLAINING it FULLY will come about SOON ENOUGH, to 'you', peoples.

However, for my own part, the singularity means the act of opposing daylight, because daylight is a representation of time and infinity using the same reality.

You appear to use the 'daylight' word in very 'unconventional ways', in the days when this is being written, which is completely fair enough but would you like to expand on and explain further what you mean by the 'daylight' word here?

If no, then WHY NOT?

Now, is the so-called 'act of opposing daylight' have ANY thing AT ALL to just what is commonly called and referred to as 'nighttime'?

And what does 'daylight is a representation of time and infinity' MEAN, to you?

Also, what does 'using the SAME reality', MEAN, or REFER TO, to you?

How many OTHER 'realities' are there, EXACTLY?

To me, 'time' is represented by the act of measuring duration, and, 'infinity' is represented by a never ending distance or expanse. But 'you' are absolutely FREE to have and use your very OWN definitions AND meanings.

I mean the word daylight, in the context of an infinity system, which is based on end points being identical, as a duo.

Imagine a line; the line must have two end points, ergo the duo. The end points of the duo are infinitely replicated, by the duo.

So, what one has is two duos - the concept of one duo being necessary, for any infinity system to work - which is being sourced by unthinking. In other words, the system of daylight is unthinking, yet it has the rules of life conveniently for its work.

The same reality, means the universe.


To clarify:
Because daylight is able to use infinitely, without awareness, it is able to be analysed infinitely without being opposed.

[Age]

Conventional awareness, means that it refers to the assimilation process, in which all data is assimilated together.

To me, the word 'singularity' can refer to when ALL physicality is together, infinite compressed. Or, if we want to take the 'singularity' word to refer to an assimilation process, in which ALL data is assimilated together, then okay. This process has ALREADY HAPPENED. But, the explanation for this was only explained later on, AFTER when this is being written. Although this 'singularity' is ALREADY UNDERSTOOD, in the days when this is being written, EXPLAINING it FULLY will come about SOON ENOUGH, to 'you', peoples.

However, for my own part, the singularity means the act of opposing daylight, because daylight is a representation of time and infinity using the same reality.

You appear to use the 'daylight' word in very 'unconventional ways', in the days when this is being written, which is completely fair enough but would you like to expand on and explain further what you mean by the 'daylight' word here?

If no, then WHY NOT?

Now, is the so-called 'act of opposing daylight' have ANY thing AT ALL to just what is commonly called and referred to as 'nighttime'?

And what does 'daylight is a representation of time and infinity' MEAN, to you?

Also, what does 'using the SAME reality', MEAN, or REFER TO, to you?

How many OTHER 'realities' are there, EXACTLY?

To me, 'time' is represented by the act of measuring duration, and, 'infinity' is represented by a never ending distance or expanse. But 'you' are absolutely FREE to have and use your very OWN definitions AND meanings.

I mean the word daylight, in the context of an infinity system, which is based on end points being identical, as a duo.

Is it even possible for an 'infinite system' to have 'end points'?

If yes, then HOW, EXACTLY?

Imagine a line; the line must have two end points, ergo the duo.

If a line is NOT an 'infinite line', then I agree that 'that line' MUST HAVE 'end points'.

I agree that there would be two 'end points' on a 'finite line' as well.

The end points of the duo are infinitely replicated, by the duo.

To me, the 'end points' I thought was the 'duo'.

What are you saying is the 'duo'?

Saying, "The end points of the duo", implies there are now two lines.

Is the word 'duo' in relation to 'two end points' or in relation to 'two lines'?

As for saying, "are infinitely replicated, by the duo", you have lost me completely here.

So, what one has is two duos - the concept of one duo being necessary, for any infinity system to work - which is being sourced by unthinking.

I am MORE LOST now.

In other words, the system of daylight is unthinking, yet it has the rules of life conveniently for its work.

Okay.

The same reality, means the universe.

Okay.

To clarify:
Because daylight is able to use infinitely, without awareness, it is able to be analysed infinitely without being opposed.

This does NOT 'clarify' ANY thing, well to me anyway.

To me, the Universe is just infinite AND eternal, and exists ALWAYS, even if there is sentient and perceiving aware human beings or not. And, the Universe is able to be analysed EXACTLY as It IS, as long as there is a species with the ability to analyze in Existence.

[trokanmariel]

To me, the word 'singularity' can refer to when ALL physicality is together, infinite compressed. Or, if we want to take the 'singularity' word to refer to an assimilation process, in which ALL data is assimilated together, then okay. This process has ALREADY HAPPENED. But, the explanation for this was only explained later on, AFTER when this is being written. Although this 'singularity' is ALREADY UNDERSTOOD, in the days when this is being written, EXPLAINING it FULLY will come about SOON ENOUGH, to 'you', peoples.



You appear to use the 'daylight' word in very 'unconventional ways', in the days when this is being written, which is completely fair enough but would you like to expand on and explain further what you mean by the 'daylight' word here?

If no, then WHY NOT?

Now, is the so-called 'act of opposing daylight' have ANY thing AT ALL to just what is commonly called and referred to as 'nighttime'?

And what does 'daylight is a representation of time and infinity' MEAN, to you?

Also, what does 'using the SAME reality', MEAN, or REFER TO, to you?

How many OTHER 'realities' are there, EXACTLY?

To me, 'time' is represented by the act of measuring duration, and, 'infinity' is represented by a never ending distance or expanse. But 'you' are absolutely FREE to have and use your very OWN definitions AND meanings.

I mean the word daylight, in the context of an infinity system, which is based on end points being identical, as a duo.

Is it even possible for an 'infinite system' to have 'end points'?

If yes, then HOW, EXACTLY?

Imagine a line; the line must have two end points, ergo the duo.

If a line is NOT an 'infinite line', then I agree that 'that line' MUST HAVE 'end points'.

I agree that there would be two 'end points' on a 'finite line' as well.

The end points of the duo are infinitely replicated, by the duo.

To me, the 'end points' I thought was the 'duo'.

What are you saying is the 'duo'?

Saying, "The end points of the duo", implies there are now two lines.

Is the word 'duo' in relation to 'two end points' or in relation to 'two lines'?

As for saying, "are infinitely replicated, by the duo", you have lost me completely here.

So, what one has is two duos - the concept of one duo being necessary, for any infinity system to work - which is being sourced by unthinking.

I am MORE LOST now.

In other words, the system of daylight is unthinking, yet it has the rules of life conveniently for its work.

Okay.

The same reality, means the universe.

Okay.

To clarify:
Because daylight is able to use infinitely, without awareness, it is able to be analysed infinitely without being opposed.

This does NOT 'clarify' ANY thing, well to me anyway.

To me, the Universe is just infinite AND eternal, and exists ALWAYS, even if there is sentient and perceiving aware human beings or not. And, the Universe is able to be analysed EXACTLY as It IS, as long as there is a species with the ability to analyze in Existence.

Day and nighttime is proof of a bridge system. The bridge has infinity, even though bridges are means.

In terms of the proof, that day and nighttime are bridges, I would just say that the very act of transition is the proof, as transition inherently implies deference.

[Age]

I mean the word daylight, in the context of an infinity system, which is based on end points being identical, as a duo.

Is it even possible for an 'infinite system' to have 'end points'?

If yes, then HOW, EXACTLY?

Imagine a line; the line must have two end points, ergo the duo.

If a line is NOT an 'infinite line', then I agree that 'that line' MUST HAVE 'end points'.

I agree that there would be two 'end points' on a 'finite line' as well.

The end points of the duo are infinitely replicated, by the duo.

To me, the 'end points' I thought was the 'duo'.

What are you saying is the 'duo'?

Saying, "The end points of the duo", implies there are now two lines.

Is the word 'duo' in relation to 'two end points' or in relation to 'two lines'?

As for saying, "are infinitely replicated, by the duo", you have lost me completely here.

So, what one has is two duos - the concept of one duo being necessary, for any infinity system to work - which is being sourced by unthinking.

I am MORE LOST now.

In other words, the system of daylight is unthinking, yet it has the rules of life conveniently for its work.

Okay.

The same reality, means the universe.

Okay.

To clarify:
Because daylight is able to use infinitely, without awareness, it is able to be analysed infinitely without being opposed.

This does NOT 'clarify' ANY thing, well to me anyway.

To me, the Universe is just infinite AND eternal, and exists ALWAYS, even if there is sentient and perceiving aware human beings or not. And, the Universe is able to be analysed EXACTLY as It IS, as long as there is a species with the ability to analyze in Existence.

Day and nighttime is proof of a bridge system. The bridge has infinity, even though bridges are means.

In terms of the proof, that day and nighttime are bridges, I would just say that the very act of transition is the proof, as transition inherently implies deference.

'Proof' for 'what', EXACTLY?

I do not even know what 'it' is that you are 'trying to' CLAIM or 'trying to' PROVE here.

Will you enLIGHTen us to this FIRST, then 'things' might just become as CLEAR as 'daylight'.

[trokanmariel]

Is it even possible for an 'infinite system' to have 'end points'?

If yes, then HOW, EXACTLY?


If a line is NOT an 'infinite line', then I agree that 'that line' MUST HAVE 'end points'.

I agree that there would be two 'end points' on a 'finite line' as well.


To me, the 'end points' I thought was the 'duo'.

What are you saying is the 'duo'?

Saying, "The end points of the duo", implies there are now two lines.

Is the word 'duo' in relation to 'two end points' or in relation to 'two lines'?

As for saying, "are infinitely replicated, by the duo", you have lost me completely here.


I am MORE LOST now.



Okay.



Okay.



This does NOT 'clarify' ANY thing, well to me anyway.

To me, the Universe is just infinite AND eternal, and exists ALWAYS, even if there is sentient and perceiving aware human beings or not. And, the Universe is able to be analysed EXACTLY as It IS, as long as there is a species with the ability to analyze in Existence.

Day and nighttime is proof of a bridge system. The bridge has infinity, even though bridges are means.

In terms of the proof, that day and nighttime are bridges, I would just say that the very act of transition is the proof, as transition inherently implies deference.

'Proof' for 'what', EXACTLY?

I do not even know what 'it' is that you are 'trying to' CLAIM or 'trying to' PROVE here.

Will you enLIGHTen us to this FIRST, then 'things' might just become as CLEAR as 'daylight'.

People shouldn't be using speed, when they have infinity at their disposal. It seems that the solution, is to stop daylight, through acknowledging its bridge reference.

[Age]

Day and nighttime is proof of a bridge system. The bridge has infinity, even though bridges are means.

In terms of the proof, that day and nighttime are bridges, I would just say that the very act of transition is the proof, as transition inherently implies deference.

'Proof' for 'what', EXACTLY?

I do not even know what 'it' is that you are 'trying to' CLAIM or 'trying to' PROVE here.

Will you enLIGHTen us to this FIRST, then 'things' might just become as CLEAR as 'daylight'.

People shouldn't be using speed, when they have infinity at their disposal. It seems that the solution, is to stop daylight, through acknowledging its bridge reference.

And this is WHY some people say, "Life is a terminal illness".

[vegetariantaxidermy]

'Proof' for 'what', EXACTLY?

I do not even know what 'it' is that you are 'trying to' CLAIM or 'trying to' PROVE here.

Will you enLIGHTen us to this FIRST, then 'things' might just become as CLEAR as 'daylight'.

People shouldn't be using speed, when they have infinity at their disposal. It seems that the solution, is to stop daylight, through acknowledging its bridge reference.

And this is WHY some people say, "Life is a terminal illness".

I think it's a bot. A bot that doesn't understand the purpose of the comma.

[trokanmariel]

'Proof' for 'what', EXACTLY?

I do not even know what 'it' is that you are 'trying to' CLAIM or 'trying to' PROVE here.

Will you enLIGHTen us to this FIRST, then 'things' might just become as CLEAR as 'daylight'.

People shouldn't be using speed, when they have infinity at their disposal. It seems that the solution, is to stop daylight, through acknowledging its bridge reference.

And this is WHY some people say, "Life is a terminal illness".

I understand the sentiment, of your statement, but, even if the afterlife is real, there's still a necessity of solving a problem. And it's because one can empathise with the truth, that the afterlife is equal to reality (animal evolution being the proof).

Stopping daylight doesn't mean extinction, for humanity, it just means producing an alternate system of transition through time.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

People shouldn't be using speed, when they have infinity at their disposal. It seems that the solution, is to stop daylight, through acknowledging its bridge reference.

And this is WHY some people say, "Life is a terminal illness".

I understand the sentiment, of your statement, but, even if the afterlife is real, there's still a necessity of solving a problem. And it's because one can empathise with the truth, that the afterlife is equal to reality (animal evolution being the proof).

Stopping daylight doesn't mean extinction, for humanity, it just means producing an alternate system of transition through time.

Go and google 'how to use the comma' or fuck off (I can't believe I'm addressing a bot).