On the other hand...Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 6:03 pmWhat I can say -- I hope this helps you - is that she is, or was, a longtime advocate for LGB rights. It is important that you understand this.iambiguous wrote: ↑Fri Mar 31, 2023 5:40 pm I watched to the part where she comes off [to me] as another Satyr: biologically there are men and women who are programmed by nature to fuck and reproduce the species. Anything other than that is "fake"/"unnatural" and must be opposed. Transgender folks are encouraged by the medical industrial complex because tons and tons of money can be made operating on them. Certain billionaires are behind it all. Billionaire Jews for example.
As though there are not in fact men and women who really do feel more comfortable/fulfilled imagining themselves as the other gender. As though homosexuality and such really was an unnatural perversion. As though everything relating to human sexuality must pertain exclusively to reproduction of the species.
Now, give us your own take on her point in the video. And note the hard evidence she provides to back it up and sustain it.
The rest of what you have written is outrageous misconstruing -- I assume deliberate but it may also be possible that you have difficulties reading and reasoning about what you have read.
So instead of paraphrasing what she has said, I would focus on your problems in reading (listening) and understanding.
Certainly as a feminist, and pro-woman, she is uncomfortable with men who artificially adopt women's 'parts' and then assume they can be referred to, and should be referred to, as legitimate women. That is definitely a position she takes.
Actually, what is important to me [as it pertains to you and the Northern European white stock champions] is what happens to transgender folks if she and her ilk actually acquire the political power to enforce [legally and otherwise] her ideological agenda regarding human sexuality.I watched to the part where she comes off [to me] as another Satyr: biologically there are men and women who are programmed by nature to fuck and reproduce the species. Anything other than that is "fake"/"unnatural" and must be opposed. Transgender folks are encouraged by the medical industrial complex because tons and tons of money can be made operating on them. Certain billionaires are behind it all. Billionaire Jews for example.
As though there are not in fact men and women who really do feel more comfortable/fulfilled imagining themselves as the other gender. As though homosexuality and such really was an unnatural perversion. As though everything relating to human sexuality must pertain exclusively to reproduction of the species.
Now, give us your own take on her point in the video. And note the hard evidence she provides to back it up and sustain it.
And just out of curiosity, what is your own position regarding LGB rights? How close to or far away from those like Satyr are you?
Me? I'm no less fractured and fragmented regarding human sexuality. And I recognize that my current frame of mind is still just a set of political prejudices that I acquired existentially re dasein.
Just like you. Well, if you are ever actually able to recognize how we acquire moral and political value judgments given the arguments I make in the OPs here:
https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop ... 1&t=176529
https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop ... 1&t=194382
And how, given what I construe to be the "psychology of objectivism", you are understood by me above.