Agent Smith wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 3:46 am
Age wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 3:35 am
Agent Smith wrote: ↑Wed Mar 08, 2023 10:48 am
Your question must be/hasta be about confirmation bias.
Do your questions, statements, or claims must be/have to be about confirmation bias ALSO, or just mine here?
Agent Smith wrote: ↑Wed Mar 08, 2023 10:48 am
I've replied to that already, as in we must cease diggin' deeper, assuming the analogy is apt.
You have replied to what, EXACTLY?
Also, why MUST you cease digging deeper?
And, I suggest NOT assuming ANY thing here.
Agent Smith wrote: ↑Wed Mar 08, 2023 10:48 am
As for Descartes, if you're askin' that is, he's, for me, a great thinker although he would've,
ex mea (humble) sententia, outdone himself if he'd grown up in Tibet.
Just to make it absolutely CLEAR, I was NOT asking absolutely ANY thing like this.
It seems I lost track of our discussion.
That is fine. It is a VERY common practice here.
Agent Smith wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 3:46 am
Anyway, it all began with me saying truth is elusive, you questioning that and, as is part and parcel of the domain, you asking a tough one so to speak
.
What might be 'tough', to you, is VERY EASY, to me.
Agent Smith wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 3:46 am
Should we, the pressing concern is, waste each other's time?
Look, if some one wants to come here to CLAIM some 'thing' as being true, then I suggest that they be ABLE TO back up and support their CLAIM BEFORE they even begin to make the CLAIM in the beginning.
You made a CLAIM, which the Truth of, well to me anyway, IS OBVIOUS. That is; when LOOKED AT, and INTO, FULLY, Honestly, and OPENLY.
I just asked you a CLARIFYING QUESTION in regards to YOUR CLAIM.
We are just WAITING for YOUR ANSWER.
By the way, NONE of this is wasting MY 'time' AT ALL. The longer and more that you DEFLECT is just REVEALING MORE of the ACTUAL Truth, which I have been CLAIMING, SHOWING, and POINTING OUT here, in this forum.
Agent Smith wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 3:46 am
I have very little of it left if you catch me drift.
I suggest you just CLEARLY SAY, and STATE, what you ACTUALLY MEAN, INSTEAD.
ALSO, and by the way, if you ACTUALLY MEAN what you SAY, and STATE, then this will be MUCH BETER for EVERY one involved here
Agent Smith wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 3:46 am
Furthermore, you give me the impression of an intelligent person - why wrack your head over trivialities?
1. Impressions can be VERY DECEIVING.
2. What are 'trivialities' to some are NOT necessarily 'trivialities' to some.
Agent Smith wrote: ↑Thu Mar 09, 2023 3:46 amIt's most unfortunate/fortunate (I can't tell) that the media doesn't headline philosophical breakthroughs.
Will you list any of these so-called 'philisophical breakthroughs', which 'you' are thinking of here?
If no, then WHY NOT?