Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 3:23 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 1:21 pm
Is this because hedgehogs do NOT have the ABILITY to COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND 'lectures', or for some other reason?
I think that even if hedgehogs were able to understand lectures they wouldn't change their behaviour as a result of being subjected to them.
Okay. Do you think human beings, or some human beings, or no human beings would change their behavior as a result of being subjected to lectures?
And, if you think some or all human beings would, then would that be to all or just some lectures?
Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 3:23 pm
And, is it, REALLY, in hedgehog's 'nature' to so-call 'mess up the road', by 'placing themselves in the path of oncoming traffic'? Or, is just a part of Nature, Itself, that another species of animal evolved so much faster or quicker that they began to imagine, design, and create roads, automobiles, and traffic BEFORE the hedgehogs could evolve ways to AVOID the 'oncoming traffic'?
I would say this is an example of two species of animal behaving according to their natures.
Okay great.
So, to you, do ALL species of animal behave according to 'their natures'?
Either way, what is the DIFFERENCE between the human beings animal's 'nature' and the hedgehog's 'nature'?
Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 3:23 pm
Now, would you like to SHOW A time WHERE I have, while just POINTING OUT the FAULTS and FLAWS with 'you', adult human beings, I have ALSO been 'critical', or 'so critical', of those FAULTS or FLAWS? I CERTAINLY can NOT SEE ANY in the example above here. BUT, maybe 'you', or "others", can SEE what I have YET TO.
Statements like this seem to imply criticism, and you seem to make quite a lot of such statements:
"ALL human beings are BORN, or created, PERFECT. They, very sadly, and however, LEARN from adult human beings, and so BECOME LIARS, DECEIVERS, 'evil', and therefore CREATE a world of 'suffering'."
Okay GREAT, thank you for the Honest CLARIFICATION.
Was it only the 'very sadly' words, which 'implied' the 'criticism' here, or were there other indicators?
If the latter, then what were they?
Also, is it possible to SHOW and REVEAL the FAULTS and FLAWS from the human being's 'nature' WITHOUT 'implying' a sense of 'criticism'?
If yes, then will you provide some examples of HOW TO?
By the way, is it fair that you perceive that I am being so-called 'so critical' when, to me, I am just POINTING OUT and SHOWING the FAULTS and FLAWS in adult human behavior. Which, by the way, is just the VERY NATURAL WAY that Nature, Itself, WORKS.
SEE, adult human beings FAULTING and FAILING is EXACTLY what IS intended, for the OUTCOME, soon to come for 'you', to be ABLE TO BECOME 'Reality'
Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 3:23 pm
If you say you are just stating a fact without a value judgement attached, I cannot prove otherwise, but I suspect that most people reading it would infer cticism.
Okay. There is NO REAL USE in my STATING what thee ACTUAL Truth IS here.
I wonder if, let us say "david attenborough" for example, gets 'criticized' for 'criticizing' what animals do, when maybe "david attenborough" is just stating the facts of what animals do, according to 'their nature', without value judgment?
By the way, are 'you' stating the fact of what you ASSUME I am doing here, without value judgment, OR, with value judgement, and thus really just criticizing me here?
And, could it be the case that I could just be stating Facts WITHOUT a value judgement attached FAR LESS than may come across. Have some people been ABLE TO 'master the art' of communication BETTER, with 'you', human beings, than I have, like "david attenborough"? Or, could it be the case because "david attenborough" talks about, or states facts about, OTHER animals and NOT the human being animal, like I do, and adult human beings do NOT necessarily like to be TOLD the Truth about 'them', nor have the SPOTLIGHT SHINED UPON 'them', and so being 'so critical' is PRESUME FAR MORE OFTEN?
ONCE AGAIN, there are SO MANY 'things' to ACTUALLY LOOK AT and CONSIDER here now.