Humans are the Co-Creators of Reality They are In [3]

[Veritas Aequitas]

Reality is All-There-Is, btw NEVER a Totality.
All-There-Is comprised all humans therein.
Humans has a Will and faculty of Agency.

Reality, All-There-Is exists with Time and Space.
Every moment in time is a different state of reality.
Humans has a Will and faculty of Agency.
Whenever humans acts unintentionally and intentionally, they create a new reality, e.g. reality at t1, t2, t3 and so on.
For example, even a person coughs he had changed the reality at t1 to t2 which are completely different.
When a person drives are car [gas] to a destination, he is continually creating a new reality [a new all-there-is].

From the above,
Humans are the Co-Creators of Reality They are In
as such,
Humans are entangled with reality or
reality is entangled with the human conditions.

There is no absolutely independent reality that is untangled nor unconditioned with the human conditions.

Humans are the Co-Creators of Reality They are In.

Views?

[Veritas Aequitas]

I anticipate many will question,
what about the time before there were no humans or the time after they are no humans.

Note the terms 'question' 'time' 'before' and 'after' are inevitably entangled with the human conditions.

As such the question above is a non-starter because the human conditions are necessary to raise the above question [speculative and inferred] in the first place.

[Iwannaplato]

I anticipate many will question,
what about the time before there were no humans or the time after they are no humans.

Note the terms 'question' 'time' 'before' and 'after' are inevitably entangled with the human conditions.

As such the question above is a non-starter because the human conditions are necessary to raise the above question [speculative and inferred] in the first place.

The question is entangled, but not the reality before humans. Map and terroritory confusions.

[Skepdick]

The question is entangled, but not the reality before humans. Map and terroritory confusions.

THE reality?

At which point in time?
Perceived from which point in space?

The irony of falling for the exact confusion you are warning us about...

[Wizard22]

Reality is fluid and like an ocean. So when you say "create a reality", essentially, you are trying to divide the ocean into droplets. That's the challenge of reality.

Reality is highly subjective and dependent upon individual, or even tribalistic Perspectives. The beliefs and "reality" of a poor rural village in China, is distinctly different than the beliefs and "reality" of rich suburbanites in Austin, Texas. Trying to merge disparate and distinct realities, is the challenge. Communication is critical. If one person speaks English and another Chinese, then how can they merge or compare their "realities"?

If people cannot fundamentally agree, then how can they merge or compare their "realities"?

[FlashDangerpants]

Reality, All-There-Is exists with Time and Space.
Every moment in time is a different state of reality.
Humans has a Will and faculty of Agency.
Whenever humans acts unintentionally and intentionally, they create a new reality, e.g. reality at t1, t2, t3 and so on.
For example, even a person coughs he had changed the reality at t1 to t2 which are completely different.
When a person drives are car [gas] to a destination, he is continually creating a new reality [a new all-there-is].

This leaves no reason to suppose that the same person continues through t2 to t3.
In a new reality, a person is at position p1 and time t1.
In some subsequent reality there is a person in p3 and t3 but that has no automatic relation to some other person in history at p1.

I don't understand what the "[gas]" thing is for?

Anyway, it's all just an abuse of concepts, and no fall back upon Grice will change any of that.

[Veritas Aequitas]

This leaves no reason to suppose that the same person continues through t2 to t3.
In a new reality, a person is at position p1 and time t1.
In some subsequent reality there is a person in p3 and t3 but that has no automatic relation to some other person in history at p1.

The OP "Humans are the Co-Creators of Reality They are In,"
thus even if there is a new person at every p[] or t[], they are still humans, so that align with the OP.

There are various perspectives to the above,
in one perspective of reality, it is the same person within a same stream of continuous entanglements,
but in another perspective of reality it is like Heraclitus' no one can step into a same river twice, i.e. there is new person at every p[] and t[] point.

Both state of reality are real but conditioned to its utility to various humans towards the survival the individual[s] and of humanity.

[Iwannaplato]

This leaves no reason to suppose that the same person continues through t2 to t3.
In a new reality, a person is at position p1 and time t1.
In some subsequent reality there is a person in p3 and t3 but that has no automatic relation to some other person in history at p1.

The OP "Humans are the Co-Creators of Reality They are In,"
thus even if there is a new person at every p[] or t[], they are still humans, so that align with the OP.

Well, if it is a new person it t2, then the reality they are in was created by someone else.