Should college lecturers discuss sex's Writing To Page Is From Sex, to help left-wing magic implement WTP Is From Left?

[trokanmariel]

Should college lecturers discuss sex's Writing To Page Is From Sex, as a means to help left-wing magic implement WTP Is From Left?


For Frankenweenie

[Sculptor]

[Immanuel Can]

This topic composed by Kamala Harris.

[trokanmariel]

This topic composed by Kamala Harris.

The presidency could warrant the sex's/left-wing's writing for page, but, that could mean the edges of outer space would be obliged to surrender their ideas assembly to the imagination-logistic assembly.

The ideas assembly: how to distinguish it from the IL assembly?

It may be possible, that the IL assembly is a bluff of inversion, meaning that there is no identity trade. Physics of blocks could be the definition, of the IL assembly. Whereas with the ideas assembly, there is the parody of the ideas' story context not using the physics.

the ideas' story context not using the physics:
what is this?

If we take physics to mean blocks, blocks which can help one another create bridges for the story, items such as switching the TV channel, turning the camera on and off, and editing on a computer can all be the blocks.

Then, there is obscurity as censorship-validation politics (film/TV show/reality entertainment reference) and then there is the sociology of reality story: the sociology of reality story, can include outer space being an obscurity as censorship-validation politics (this means that it's a parody of reference relative to the labour it took to create it) relative to the physics master's non-belief in pendulum systems of the universe using the empathy to left behind machine, due to the machine's hijacking by keeping up with the reference, by Mason dertry.

The empathy, of connecting celebrity citation to definitive data structure; unless it's a visual word manifestation politics, the aristocracy of block to block can't handle it, even despite the revelation, that the hijacking by the KUWTR system (especially of its celebrity inference) is an absence of gravitation between user and visual target, by Mason Dertry, along the lines of Dertry's belief in me and him confronting the inevitability, that body glamour's gravitation to body glamour was an absence of proof system (this meaning that the story's content's manifestation can't use physics) which resulted in the split between ideas's brain and physics's legwork.

Is it feasible, that outer space can be turned into a celebrity citation cock-up?
Moreover: is it feasible that dertry was the one who turned it into such the popular condition of the usual imagination?

In either case, relative to the second question, I would venture that outer space adopting such ulterior is logic for it to take over the horror story of emotion living past as to days.

Past as to days: it means that one is the conundrum of never having an anchor for day to day experience.