Continuous motion possible or impossible

[simplicity]

But something cannot be and not be at the same instant.

The introduction of time into any equation may make all things work [but only within our primitive view of the Universe]. Delete the same and you will discover that all things are possible.

Continuous motion, in general, is impossible, including changes in time.

Can you tell me something that is NOT in continuous motion?

[Sculptor]

But something cannot be and not be at the same instant.

The introduction of time into any equation may make all things work [but only within our primitive view of the Universe]. Delete the same and you will discover that all things are possible.

Continuous motion, in general, is impossible, including changes in time.

There is nothing you can see; nothing you can know; and nothing you have experienced that is motionless.
i.e. stillness is impossible

Everything in the universe is in motion.

[simplicity]

There is nothing you can see; nothing you can know; and nothing you have experienced that is motionless.
i.e. stillness is impossible

Everything in the universe is in motion.

I knew there was something that we could agree on 100%!

[bahman]

The introduction of time into any equation may make all things work [but only within our primitive view of the Universe]. Delete the same and you will discover that all things are possible.

Continuous motion, in general, is impossible, including changes in time.

There is nothing you can see; nothing you can know; and nothing you have experienced that is motionless.
i.e. stillness is impossible

Everything in the universe is in motion.

What you experience is not proof of continuous motion. Remember the example of film.

[Sculptor]

Continuous motion, in general, is impossible, including changes in time.

There is nothing you can see; nothing you can know; and nothing you have experienced that is motionless.
i.e. stillness is impossible

Everything in the universe is in motion.

What you experience is not proof of continuous motion. Remember the example of film.

As the earth revolves you are an idiot.

[bahman]

There is nothing you can see; nothing you can know; and nothing you have experienced that is motionless.
i.e. stillness is impossible

Everything in the universe is in motion.

What you experience is not proof of continuous motion. Remember the example of film.

As the earth revolves you are an idiot.

Yes, but it moves on a grid where the distance between two points is very small.

[Age]

Is there any neural net in CPU?

What do you mean here? Like when flashes on a computer screen are seen when the human head, of living and thinking human body, is put in a magnetic resonance imaging device?

If yes, then I do not know.

Has a central processing unit even been put into a magnetic resonance imaging device, while the central processing unit has been switched on, and is working?

Don't you know what a neural net is? Do you know what a neuron is? If yes then a neural net is a net of neurons.

Is that thee One and ONLY definition?

Also, and ONCE AGAIN, what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that while a human being has and holds a BELIEF, then they are NOT OPEN to SEEING what thee ACTUAL Reality IS, around them.

I asked you a CLARIFYING QUESTION, so do you KNOW WHY you did NOT answer it?

[Sculptor]

What you experience is not proof of continuous motion. Remember the example of film.

As the earth revolves you are an idiot.

Yes, but it moves on a grid where the distance between two points is very small.

The only thing that is very small here is your brain

[bahman]

As the earth revolves you are an idiot.

Yes, but it moves on a grid where the distance between two points is very small.

The only thing that is very small here is your brain

So that is your counterargument?

[bahman]

What do you mean here? Like when flashes on a computer screen are seen when the human head, of living and thinking human body, is put in a magnetic resonance imaging device?

If yes, then I do not know.

Has a central processing unit even been put into a magnetic resonance imaging device, while the central processing unit has been switched on, and is working?

Don't you know what a neural net is? Do you know what a neuron is? If yes then a neural net is a net of neurons.

Is that thee One and ONLY definition?

Also, and ONCE AGAIN, what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that while a human being has and holds a BELIEF, then they are NOT OPEN to SEEING what thee ACTUAL Reality IS, around them.

I asked you a CLARIFYING QUESTION, so do you KNOW WHY you did NOT answer it?

Yes, it is only a definition. Your questions are completely irrelevant to the topic.

[Sculptor]

Yes, but it moves on a grid where the distance between two points is very small.

The only thing that is very small here is your brain

So that is your counterargument?

A counter argument is not required when no argument of substance has been presented.

[bahman]

The only thing that is very small here is your brain

So that is your counterargument?

A counter argument is not required when no argument of substance has been presented.

But I have a few arguments against the continuous motion: 1) The OP, 2) here, etc.

[Sculptor]

So that is your counterargument?

A counter argument is not required when no argument of substance has been presented.

But I have a few arguments against the continuous motion: 1) The OP, 2) here, etc.

[bahman]

A counter argument is not required when no argument of substance has been presented.

But I have a few arguments against the continuous motion: 1) The OP, 2) here, etc.

That is your counterargument?

[Sculptor]

But I have a few arguments against the continuous motion: 1) The OP, 2) here, etc.

That is your counterargument?

A counter argument is not required when no argument of substance has been presented.