I am done with you.
Continuous motion possible or impossible
-
- Posts: 5166
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
It does as I elaborated in another thread.commonsense wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:29 pmThe cause and effect are unique events. One follows the other sequentially. This doesn’t make continuousness impossible.
-
- Posts: 5166
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
You posited that gaps are possible, but not that the absence of a gap is impossible.bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:32 pmIt does as I elaborated in another thread.commonsense wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:29 pmThe cause and effect are unique events. One follows the other sequentially. This doesn’t make continuousness impossible.
-
- Posts: 5166
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
When a film is moving, it appears to be moving. When the film is not moving, it appears to be a series of individual frames.bahman wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:53 pmSo a film is continuous?commonsense wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:48 pmOne can only rely on what is experienced, and trust that it’s consistent with the majority of others.
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
No, I posited that the gap between cause and effect is certain if cause and effect are not simultaneous.commonsense wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:51 pmYou posited that gaps are possible, but not that the absence of a gap is impossible.bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:32 pmIt does as I elaborated in another thread.commonsense wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:29 pm
The cause and effect are unique events. One follows the other sequentially. This doesn’t make continuousness impossible.
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
My point was that we cannot rely on experience. What it appears and what is real could be different things.commonsense wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 6:41 pmWhen a film is moving, it appears to be moving. When the film is not moving, it appears to be a series of individual frames.bahman wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:53 pmSo a film is continuous?commonsense wrote: ↑Fri Nov 26, 2021 9:48 pm
One can only rely on what is experienced, and trust that it’s consistent with the majority of others.
-
- Posts: 750
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2021 5:23 pm
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
Experience is the ONLY thing you can rely on [but you must have the correct expectations], e.g., reality is relative to the distance you are from an object of interest.bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 6:54 pmMy point was that we cannot rely on experience. What it appears and what is real could be different things.commonsense wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 6:41 pmWhen a film is moving, it appears to be moving. When the film is not moving, it appears to be a series of individual frames.
-
- Posts: 5166
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
I see you’re saying not that gaps are possible but that they are certain. If you explain how that is so, you will have convinced me that I have been wrong.bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 6:51 pmNo, I posited that the gap between cause and effect is certain if cause and effect are not simultaneous.commonsense wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 5:51 pmYou posited that gaps are possible, but not that the absence of a gap is impossible.
-
- Posts: 5166
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
[redacted]bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 6:54 pmMy point was that we cannot rely on experience. What it appears and what is real could be different things.commonsense wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 6:41 pmWhen a film is moving, it appears to be moving. When the film is not moving, it appears to be a series of individual frames.
Re: Continuous motion possible or impossible
ONCE AGAIN, you 'TRY TO' DETRACT from what thee ACTUAL QUESTION was asking.bahman wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 12:04 pmYes, it is only a definition.Age wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 8:00 amIs that thee One and ONLY definition?
Also, and ONCE AGAIN, what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that while a human being has and holds a BELIEF, then they are NOT OPEN to SEEING what thee ACTUAL Reality IS, around them.
I asked you a CLARIFYING QUESTION, so do you KNOW WHY you did NOT answer it?
YOUR definition was OBVIOUSLY 'only a definition', but was it thee One and ONLY definition?
And, YOUR definition, which is 'only a definition' is NOT thee definition that MOST people use.
Also, noted is you did NOT answer my CLARIFYING QUESTION posed to you here.
This OBVIOUSLY is a complete and utter False, Wrong, AND Incorrect CLAIM of yours here.