A Senseless Argument 1

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 8595
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

A Senseless Argument 1

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

1. "All that exists" necessitates a whole being as one being considering "all" is "everything".

2. This whole exists through the relationship of its parts thus making the whole, through relation, a part of being given the "whole" (as wholism) is a "part" of the relationships between beings.

"All" results in "parts" considering "all" is a statement of multiplicity. Thus here is a dichotomy between the "whole" and the "part" with this necessitating the "whole" as part of this dichotomy thus no longer the "whole".

3. A part of being is an individual state and as such is a whole in the respect it exists as an individual entity. This individuality as a whole is necessitated by the singularity of the phenomenon. This singularity is one thing amidst many with this nature of being "amidst" many resulting in a contrast of one individual and another. The "whole" exists in contrast to what is "not whole".

4. This individual entity can only be observed relative to another individual entity, through the phenomenon of "contrast", thus is no longer an individual entity as it is dependent upon this relationship. This is considering the individual entity as a singularity is one thing amidst many with this "one amidst many" necessitating a relationship.

5. The relationship of individuals results in the connection of said individuals as one thing thus "one" individual reality results from the "many".

6. Many things result in one thing and one thing results in many things. This dualism between the one and the many results in one respect "many" phenomenon occurring, considering both the "one" and the "many" are both individual phenomena as universals, while in another respect "one" phenomenon occurring, considering both the "one" and the "many" are both connected as universals dependent upon one another.

7. The "one" and the "many" result in contradiction thus being itself is a state of contradiction given being is classified under the terms of "one" or "many" through the respective "whole" and the respective "particular". Being through classification is being through contradiction.

8. This nature of contradiction, which underlies all classified being(s), is a singular state of affairs given contradiction "underlies" being with this nature of "underlying being" resulting in contradiction as a universal.

9. As a singular state of affairs, "contradiction" gains its identity through contrast with what is "not contradiction" thus resulting in many states of being, ie "contradictive" and "not contradictive".

10. This dichotomy between "contradictive" and "not contradictive" defines itself through a relationship thus exists as "one" state of being. This relationship exists in contrast to an absence of relationship thus resulting in "many" states of being.

11. Reality is both a contradiction and not a contradiction and neither a contradiction nor not a contradiction. It is simultaneously both a contradiction and not a contradiction or neither a contradiction nor not a contradiction.
Post Reply