1. Equality occurs amidst different phenomena through a common medium which connects them. For example a dog and cat share the same quality of "mammal" thus equate, only through, "mammal". Equality is a connection, connection is a relationship, relationship is identity. This relationship amidst two different phenomenon through a common medium also simultaneously points to a contrast where one quality is absent in another. This absence is a void, this void is a contrast. For example a dog and cat are contrasting entities as the form of a dog's nose is different from thus of a cat. Thus we can say that identity is not only grounded in equality but also contrast. The context of identity as "contrast" points to identity as grounded in a singular event. This singular event occurs through contrast where the absence of one quality in one phenomenon, and its presence in another, points to the "presence" as a singular events. 'Skepdick wrote: ↑Wed Sep 15, 2021 11:07 amNo wonder you are confused. When equating phenomena identity is equivalent to equality.
Equality/identity is a judgment. You are the judge. You complete the trinity.
No shit. That's exactly how it's defined. If there's a path (connection) between points A and B then they are equal.
It's in this book.
1a. Identity through equality is a singularity.
1b. Identity through contrast is a singularity.
1c. Identity is a singularity.
2. Without addressing the basics of any set of axioms the axioms are worthless...so yes "no shit" is necessary.