That's all fine. But you used square circles as an example of a "contradiction" (something that doesn't exist). And I am pointing out that square circles exist just fine.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sat Sep 11, 2021 10:57 am It is waste of time trying to be a smart alec in this case.
The principle here is that a Contradiction-in-General do not exist and cannot be real.
The intended example re square-circle in the typical sense is merely to denote such a contradiction.
So I am simply asking what the difference would be between an empirical and a non-empirical square circle.
I could just as well have asked what the difference would be between empirical and non-empirical thirst.
No, it's not. Is just incoherent.
Well, no. You can't. Because contradictions don't exist and cannot be real (these are your words).Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sat Sep 11, 2021 10:57 am
and I can bring in 100s or 1000s of examples of other contradictions.
So if you bring me ANY examples of what you call a "contradiction" then those examples would obviously exist as real! See the problem?