Vitruvius wrote: ↑Sun Oct 03, 2021 10:30 am
Age wrote: ↑Sun Oct 03, 2021 6:21 amThe ATTEMPTS at ridicule and put downs of "others", some human beings eventually end up resorting to when they are being challenged about their ideas and claims, but are completely and utterly INCAPABLE of backing up and supporting their ideas and claims, REVEALS more about their own insecurities and inadequacies, then ANY thing else.
Don't kid yourself. You asked for honesty and you got it.
LOL
LOL
LOL
The speed and ease at which these people turn to DEFLECTION is truly amazing.
in case you REALLY were NOT AWARE, I was talking about Honesty, from you, in regards to the questions posed to you, by me and "others", in regards to your idea/s and claim/s.
What you Honestly think of me or "others" NO one really cares about. And, if they do, then philosophy forums is REALLY NOT the right place for them.
Vitruvius wrote: ↑Sun Oct 03, 2021 10:30 am
There's no point explaining anything to you because you're not capable of understanding it. Case in point:
Cold is not a thing. It is merely the absence of heat.
Age wrote: ↑Sun Oct 03, 2021 5:27 amLOL. Therefore, it could be said, and argued, heat is not a thing. It is merely the absence of coolness.
No. It's physical fact there's no such thing as cold.
And, if this is True, then there is no such thing as hot either.
But, if you BELIEVE there is, then explain HOW there can NOT be 'cold' but there can be 'hot'.
Also, just because you CLAIM some thing, then this does NOT mean that I am NOT CAPABLE of understanding 'it'. If I do NOT agree with 'it', or if I provide some thing that OPPOSES your 'thing', then that ALSO does NOT mean that I am NOT CAPABLE of understanding 'your thing', as well. For it might be PROVEN that it was you all along that was NOT understanding what was being said and taking place.
Now, let us see if you can explain HOW there is NO such thing as 'cold', but there is such a thing as 'hot'.
If you do not, then this REVEALS more about 'you' than 'me'.
Also, will you provide links to your, so called, "physical fact" here?
If yes, then GREAT.
But if no, then WHY NOT?
Vitruvius wrote: ↑Sun Oct 03, 2021 10:30 am
It's a very basic physical fact;
Just saying, " 'it' is a physical fact ", and then re saying, " 'It' is a very basic physical fact ", does NOT, and I will repeat does NOT, make 'it' a fact NOR a physical fact.
Where is the ACTUAL PROOF that there is NO such thing as 'cold' BUT there is such a thing as 'hot'?
Vitruvius wrote: ↑Sun Oct 03, 2021 10:30 am
and given this thread is talking about energy - are you're telling me, and NASA - that magma energy can't work, won't work, never gonna solve climate change etc, it's something you should know.
I am TELLING you what I have been TELLING you. That is; magma energy is, probably, a much BETTER IDEA than coal, gas, and oil energy is. I have NEVER even thought that magma energy could not work, so I have CERTAINLY NOT ever said that it could not work. In fact I can see how it can VERY EASILY and VERY SIMPLY work. In fact, I SAW this BEFORE you ever brought this subject into this forum. So, I ALSO have, obviously, NEVER said that it would not work. I have, however, said that creating ANOTHER energy source, which only comes to fruition because of greed and the love of money by some people will NOT solve 'climate change'. I have been SAYING and TELLING YOU, OF COURSE, magma energy will produce far less carbon emissions than SOME other energy sources and so will reduce the effects on the climate like those sources of energy do.
Now, adding what you did onto the end of your sentence there was completely UNNECESSARY and just MORE PROOF of your condescending attitude towards "others", which has been POINTED OUT to you, by "another".
Vitruvius wrote: ↑Sun Oct 03, 2021 10:30 am
I tell you, and you won't have it. Now I've got tell you again, and the responses get longer and longer and more dilute of content, because you're too stupid to understand anything that's said to you. You're fucking up my thread, and I'd like you to go away.
LOL
This is YOUR ATTITUDE to discussions in your philosophy forums. What you say is irrefutably true, and if ANY disagrees or says otherwise, then they are stupid and ruining things for you.
Just so you are AWARE, saying and claiming, "magma energy will solve climate change" and "it is a physical fact that there is no such thing as 'cold' but there is such a thing as 'hot' " does NOT make what you say and claim true.
What makes what you say and claim true is ACTUAL PROOF.
And, when you START providing the ACTUAL PROOF for your claims, then you will STOP ruining your OWN threads.
You say, "I am too stupid to understand ANY thing that is said", BECAUSE you are INCAPABLE of backing up and supporting YOUR CLAIMS. Or, if you are ACTUALLY ABLE TO, you will NOT. For reasons known ONLY by you.