Isn't morality more or less innate to humans? I mean, ultimately it seems to come down to bute instinct. If I shoot at someone, then others may not appreciate it and retaliate. So I don't shoot at others, even when they cut me off in traffic. Does it make a difference whether morality is based on God or not? There is a need for morality regardless and perhaps it forms all on its own, just in order for humans to survive. In the end, perhaps religion is nothing more than a way of establishing a hierarchy whereby some (the 'deserving') take advantage of others (the 'undeserving').simplicity wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:53 pmThe idea is that you must have what would be considered a solid moral foundation...although look at what has taken place in the name of God and country over the past thousand years. Human beings seem to be avid followers of all kinds of insanity.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 10:13 pmSo, are you saying that, for example, if someone came up with a commandment that said, "Kill as much as you want" and ascribed it to God, there would be more killing in the world than there currently is? It's an interesting hypothesis. I wonder if it's true.
As well, it might be similar to what John Addams said about the American Constitution, it was written for a God-fearing people and would break down if the people decided to create their own morality. Seems like he nailed that one.
Accepting Life
-
- Posts: 7966
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Retirement Home for foolosophers
Re: Accepting Life
Re: Accepting Life
What are you being asked to accept?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 12:21 am Life and the way things are are difficult to accept sometimes. If I had one wish I think it would be to be happy with the way things are. Discontentment doesn't seem to be helping me any.
Exactly???
Re: Accepting Life
Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:15 pmIsn't morality more or less innate to humans? I mean, ultimately it seems to come down to bute instinct. If I shoot at someone, then others may not appreciate it and retaliate. So I don't shoot at others, even when they cut me off in traffic. Does it make a difference whether morality is based on God or not? There is a need for morality regardless and perhaps it forms all on its own, just in order for humans to survive. In the end, perhaps religion is nothing more than a way of establishing a hierarchy whereby some (the 'deserving') take advantage of others (the 'undeserving').simplicity wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:53 pmThe idea is that you must have what would be considered a solid moral foundation...although look at what has taken place in the name of God and country over the past thousand years. Human beings seem to be avid followers of all kinds of insanity.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 10:13 pmSo, are you saying that, for example, if someone came up with a commandment that said, "Kill as much as you want" and ascribed it to God, there would be more killing in the world than there currently is? It's an interesting hypothesis. I wonder if it's true.
As well, it might be similar to what John Addams said about the American Constitution, it was written for a God-fearing people and would break down if the people decided to create their own morality. Seems like he nailed that one.
Morals are a set of historically and culturally contingent rules, not innate.
The examples you give above could have the opposite reactions by people deoending on the context.
One thing is for sure the phrase "based on god" is usually uttered by those arrogant enough to think that their personal views can be justified by any means. I'm sure that the guys who rejected the rule of law in killing Bin Laden thought they could justify themselves in terms of god given morality, and in the same way Bin Laden did the same when the twin towers came down.
-
- Posts: 7966
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Retirement Home for foolosophers
Re: Accepting Life
Accepting that I will probably never find a woman who will reciprocate my feelings for her. I will probably never experience romantic love. I wish it were different but at 54 and only having had intimacy with a woman once in my life (a "relationship" that only lasted 4 months), it seems hopeless to aspire otherwise.Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:27 pmWhat are you being asked to accept?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 12:21 am Life and the way things are are difficult to accept sometimes. If I had one wish I think it would be to be happy with the way things are. Discontentment doesn't seem to be helping me any.
Exactly???
-
- Posts: 7966
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Retirement Home for foolosophers
Re: Accepting Life
I think morality can take many forms and manifestations (hence some degree of diversity of different codes of conduct for different human societies), however, I think wherever you have human beings congregating there will be something that will develop along the lines of a "morality," if only to facilitate the most basic communal functions. "You agree not to wrong me and I'll agree not to wrong you," as it were. Perhaps it isn't innate to humans. Perhaps morality is entirely instantiated on material phenomena.Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:32 pmGary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:15 pmIsn't morality more or less innate to humans? I mean, ultimately it seems to come down to bute instinct. If I shoot at someone, then others may not appreciate it and retaliate. So I don't shoot at others, even when they cut me off in traffic. Does it make a difference whether morality is based on God or not? There is a need for morality regardless and perhaps it forms all on its own, just in order for humans to survive. In the end, perhaps religion is nothing more than a way of establishing a hierarchy whereby some (the 'deserving') take advantage of others (the 'undeserving').simplicity wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:53 pm
The idea is that you must have what would be considered a solid moral foundation...although look at what has taken place in the name of God and country over the past thousand years. Human beings seem to be avid followers of all kinds of insanity.
As well, it might be similar to what John Addams said about the American Constitution, it was written for a God-fearing people and would break down if the people decided to create their own morality. Seems like he nailed that one.
Morals are a set of historically and culturally contingent rules, not innate.
The examples you give above could have the opposite reactions by people deoending on the context.
One thing is for sure the phrase "based on god" is usually uttered by those arrogant enough to think that their personal views can be justified by any means. I'm sure that the guys who rejected the rule of law in killing Bin Laden thought they could justify themselves in terms of god given morality, and in the same way Bin Laden did the same when the twin towers came down.
-
- Posts: 750
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2021 5:23 pm
Re: Accepting Life
It makes all the difference in the world because the word of God is based on the highest of standards [even absolutes, "Thou shall not..."]. Man, OTOH, being the weak creatures we appear to be, is [generally speaking] always looking for an excuse to run amok [which we do on a regular basis].Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:15 pmDoes it make a difference whether morality is based on God or not?
Re: Accepting Life
There are plenty of single women your age, and we exist in a time when there are many technological means by which you can find a person. I not talking about F*ck sites, but "meet ups", and formal matchmaking sites.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:38 pmAccepting that I will probably never find a woman who will reciprocate my feelings for her. I will probably never experience romantic love. I wish it were different but at 54 and only having had intimacy with a woman once in my life (a "relationship" that only lasted 4 months), it seems hopeless to aspire otherwise.Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:27 pmWhat are you being asked to accept?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Thu Jul 22, 2021 12:21 am Life and the way things are are difficult to accept sometimes. If I had one wish I think it would be to be happy with the way things are. Discontentment doesn't seem to be helping me any.
Exactly???
You just need some friendly advise about how to best present yourself, and to modify your expectations.
At your age it should be easier than when you were younger.
Re: Accepting Life
Generally true, we are co-operative beings but there are too many exceptions to make claims about innate morals. As early homonids we had to co-operate else homo erectus would never have moved out of Africa into Asia and Europe. But that evolution cannot mandate a specific morality. At all times variations are able to thrive and pray on the "better" instincts of cooperation. What we like to call psychopthathy, indifference, sociopathy can all, and do thrive parasitically predating on others. Many of our politicians CEOs and criminals all benefit from our nature. People can be like dogs, happy to join the pack and compete for the best place, others are like cats and perfer to live alone whilst others are sheep and follow.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:48 pmI think morality can take many forms and manifestations (hence some degree of diversity of different codes of conduct for different human societies), however, I think wherever you have human beings congregating there will be something that will develop along the lines of a "morality," if only to facilitate the most basic communal functions. "You agree not to wrong me and I'll agree not to wrong you," as it were. Perhaps it isn't innate to humans. Perhaps morality is entirely instantiated on material phenomena.Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:32 pmGary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:15 pm
Isn't morality more or less innate to humans? I mean, ultimately it seems to come down to bute instinct. If I shoot at someone, then others may not appreciate it and retaliate. So I don't shoot at others, even when they cut me off in traffic. Does it make a difference whether morality is based on God or not? There is a need for morality regardless and perhaps it forms all on its own, just in order for humans to survive. In the end, perhaps religion is nothing more than a way of establishing a hierarchy whereby some (the 'deserving') take advantage of others (the 'undeserving').
Morals are a set of historically and culturally contingent rules, not innate.
The examples you give above could have the opposite reactions by people deoending on the context.
One thing is for sure the phrase "based on god" is usually uttered by those arrogant enough to think that their personal views can be justified by any means. I'm sure that the guys who rejected the rule of law in killing Bin Laden thought they could justify themselves in terms of god given morality, and in the same way Bin Laden did the same when the twin towers came down.
- RCSaunders
- Posts: 4704
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Accepting Life
Excellent! But unlike dogs, and cats, and sheep, whose natures determine which they will be, every human being must choose which they will be, and unlike the animals, a human being can choose not to be like any other animal, but a productive individual dealing with others as a trader of value for value to everyone's benefit.
Re: Accepting Life
Exactly what I was sayingRCSaunders wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 1:11 pmExcellent! But unlike dogs, and cats, and sheep, whose natures determine which they will be, every human being must choose which they will be, and unlike the animals, a human being can choose not to be like any other animal,
Or be a complete shit exploiting the system to their own benefit....but a productive individual dealing with others as a trader of value for value to everyone's benefit.
- RCSaunders
- Posts: 4704
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Accepting Life
Absolutely. Seems so obvious, but apparently not to most.Sculptor wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 4:58 pmExactly what I was sayingRCSaunders wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 1:11 pmExcellent! But unlike dogs, and cats, and sheep, whose natures determine which they will be, every human being must choose which they will be, and unlike the animals, a human being can choose not to be like any other animal,Or be a complete shit exploiting the system to their own benefit....but a productive individual dealing with others as a trader of value for value to everyone's benefit.
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 22140
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: Accepting Life
What's the reason, Gary? Is it behavioural, or is there some more obvious and straightforward reason why relationships have proved problematic? Do you know?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:38 pm Accepting that I will probably never find a woman who will reciprocate my feelings for her. I will probably never experience romantic love. I wish it were different but at 54 and only having had intimacy with a woman once in my life (a "relationship" that only lasted 4 months), it seems hopeless to aspire otherwise.
-
- Posts: 7966
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Retirement Home for foolosophers
Re: Accepting Life
It's embarrassing so I'd rather not go into it. I appreciate the concern, though.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 6:16 pmWhat's the reason, Gary? Is it behavioural, or is there some more obvious and straightforward reason why relationships have proved problematic? Do you know?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:38 pm Accepting that I will probably never find a woman who will reciprocate my feelings for her. I will probably never experience romantic love. I wish it were different but at 54 and only having had intimacy with a woman once in my life (a "relationship" that only lasted 4 months), it seems hopeless to aspire otherwise.
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 22140
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: Accepting Life
I'm not trying to embarass you, and of course, you must not. Please feel free not to say. But if it's a reason you can change...or is it not?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 6:38 pmIt's embarrassing so I'd rather not go into it. I appreciate the concern, though.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 6:16 pmWhat's the reason, Gary? Is it behavioural, or is there some more obvious and straightforward reason why relationships have proved problematic? Do you know?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:38 pm Accepting that I will probably never find a woman who will reciprocate my feelings for her. I will probably never experience romantic love. I wish it were different but at 54 and only having had intimacy with a woman once in my life (a "relationship" that only lasted 4 months), it seems hopeless to aspire otherwise.
-
- Posts: 7966
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: Retirement Home for foolosophers
Re: Accepting Life
They are reasons I can't change.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 6:39 pmI'm not trying to embarass you, and of course, you must not. Please feel free not to say. But if it's a reason you can change...or is it not?Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 6:38 pmIt's embarrassing so I'd rather not go into it. I appreciate the concern, though.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sat Jul 31, 2021 6:16 pm
What's the reason, Gary? Is it behavioural, or is there some more obvious and straightforward reason why relationships have proved problematic? Do you know?