I didn't realize you were so full of projections and false conclusions.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:00 pm Hey, you asked...
...I answered. if you don't like, agree with, or understand my answer: that ain't my problem.
Christianity
Re: Christianity
- henry quirk
- Posts: 14706
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: Right here, a little less busy.
Re: Christianity
I'm thinkin' there's a lot you're not realizin'.Lacewing wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:50 pmI didn't realize you were so full of projections and false conclusions.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:00 pm Hey, you asked...
...I answered. if you don't like, agree with, or understand my answer: that ain't my problem.
Re: Christianity
You asked "henry quirk" what "henry quirk" thinks you are not seeing "lacewing", so "henry quirk" does what you ask for. But, instead of just accepting that that is what "Henry quirk" thinks or sees, you go straight into your usual accusations of "projecting" and "false conclusions".Lacewing wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:50 pmI didn't realize you were so full of projections and false conclusions.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:00 pm Hey, you asked...
...I answered. if you don't like, agree with, or understand my answer: that ain't my problem.
If you do NOT want to hear the truth, from "another's" perspective, especially in regards to 'you', then I suggest that you do NOT ask them what they think, nor see.
Also, when "another" is just expressing their honest thoughts, in this forum, and you have this constant accussation of 'projecting', have you ever stopped to consider that you are 'projecting' AS WELL?
- henry quirk
- Posts: 14706
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: Right here, a little less busy.
Re: Christianity
give 'er hell, ageAge wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:44 pmYou asked "henry quirk" what "henry quirk" thinks you are not seeing "lacewing", so "henry quirk" does what you ask for. But, instead of just accepting that that is what "Henry quirk" thinks or sees, you go straight into your usual accusations of "projecting" and "false conclusions".Lacewing wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:50 pmI didn't realize you were so full of projections and false conclusions.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:00 pm Hey, you asked...
...I answered. if you don't like, agree with, or understand my answer: that ain't my problem.
If you do NOT want to hear the truth, from "another's" perspective, especially in regards to 'you', then I suggest that you do NOT ask them what they think, nor see.
Also, when "another" is just expressing their honest thoughts, in this forum, and you have this constant accussation of 'projecting', have you ever stopped to consider that you are 'projecting' AS WELL?
Re: Christianity
Do neither of you understand the difference between thinking and projecting?henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 10:27 pmgive 'er hell, ageAge wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:44 pmYou asked "henry quirk" what "henry quirk" thinks you are not seeing "lacewing", so "henry quirk" does what you ask for. But, instead of just accepting that that is what "Henry quirk" thinks or sees, you go straight into your usual accusations of "projecting" and "false conclusions".
If you do NOT want to hear the truth, from "another's" perspective, especially in regards to 'you', then I suggest that you do NOT ask them what they think, nor see.
Also, when "another" is just expressing their honest thoughts, in this forum, and you have this constant accussation of 'projecting', have you ever stopped to consider that you are 'projecting' AS WELL?
Re: Christianity
I often think the same about you. We just have different viewpoints and methods. I've acknowledged the things I agree with you on -- but you seem less inclined to do so, instead arguing or presenting your 'more accurate answer'?
Re: Christianity
I just ask CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, from the Truly OPEN perspective, EQUALLY to EVERY one here.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 10:27 pmgive 'er hell, ageAge wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:44 pmYou asked "henry quirk" what "henry quirk" thinks you are not seeing "lacewing", so "henry quirk" does what you ask for. But, instead of just accepting that that is what "Henry quirk" thinks or sees, you go straight into your usual accusations of "projecting" and "false conclusions".
If you do NOT want to hear the truth, from "another's" perspective, especially in regards to 'you', then I suggest that you do NOT ask them what they think, nor see.
Also, when "another" is just expressing their honest thoughts, in this forum, and you have this constant accussation of 'projecting', have you ever stopped to consider that you are 'projecting' AS WELL?
And, I do NOT give ANY one any more nor any less of ANY thing here.
I also just express, by POINTING OUT and SHOWING, just what I RECOGNIZE, SEE, and OBSERVE here, EQUALLY.
Re: Christianity
I have a perspective, which, obviously, might be very different from your perspective of the difference between those two things.Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 5:33 amDo neither of you understand the difference between thinking and projecting?henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 10:27 pmgive 'er hell, ageAge wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:44 pm
You asked "henry quirk" what "henry quirk" thinks you are not seeing "lacewing", so "henry quirk" does what you ask for. But, instead of just accepting that that is what "Henry quirk" thinks or sees, you go straight into your usual accusations of "projecting" and "false conclusions".
If you do NOT want to hear the truth, from "another's" perspective, especially in regards to 'you', then I suggest that you do NOT ask them what they think, nor see.
Also, when "another" is just expressing their honest thoughts, in this forum, and you have this constant accussation of 'projecting', have you ever stopped to consider that you are 'projecting' AS WELL?
Were you under some sort of ILLUSION, or ASSUMING, that there is ONLY One difference between 'thinking' and 'projecting'?
Re: Christianity
Do you feel a 'need' to be informed when one agrees with you or would you like to be informed when we agree with you?
If yes, then I will pay more attention of doing this, for you.
Re: Christianity
Where all the integers lead is uncaused cause . Do you and Immanuel agree?henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 3:07 am Here's an experiment demonstrating it.
Get yourself a piece of paper.
On it, write "0"
But before you write "0", this experiment requires you first have to have already written "-1."
But before you write "-1", you have to already have written "-2".
And before that, you already have to have written "-3", "-4", "-5," and so on, back to infinity.
That models an infinite regress of causes, because each integer is a prerequisite for the next one, just like each cause in an infinite regress is the prerequisite of the effect associated with it.
So just sit down with some paper, and try to do it.
And then respond as soon as you've managed to write "0," or when you realize the truth: that there will never come a point when you can write even a single integer, let alone reach the "0" point (i.e. the present).
And just as you can never start writing, so too a universe can never begin if it requires an infinite chain of causes.
- RCSaunders
- Posts: 4704
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Christianity
- henry quirk
- Posts: 14706
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: Right here, a little less busy.
Re: Christianity
who is which?RCSaunders wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 2:39 pm"Down to earth," vs. "away with the fairies."
- henry quirk
- Posts: 14706
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: Right here, a little less busy.
Re: Christianity
If you mean: do we agree that God is the unmoved mover?Belinda wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 11:41 amWhere all the integers lead is uncaused cause . Do you and Immanuel agree?henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 3:07 am Here's an experiment demonstrating it.
Get yourself a piece of paper.
On it, write "0"
But before you write "0", this experiment requires you first have to have already written "-1."
But before you write "-1", you have to already have written "-2".
And before that, you already have to have written "-3", "-4", "-5," and so on, back to infinity.
That models an infinite regress of causes, because each integer is a prerequisite for the next one, just like each cause in an infinite regress is the prerequisite of the effect associated with it.
So just sit down with some paper, and try to do it.
And then respond as soon as you've managed to write "0," or when you realize the truth: that there will never come a point when you can write even a single integer, let alone reach the "0" point (i.e. the present).
And just as you can never start writing, so too a universe can never begin if it requires an infinite chain of causes.
Yes (though we currently differ on His details).
- henry quirk
- Posts: 14706
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: Right here, a little less busy.
Re: Christianity
short bus makin' way for short busAge wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 10:29 amDo you feel a 'need' to be informed when one agrees with you or would you like to be informed when we agree with you?
If yes, then I will pay more attention of doing this, for you.
BEEP! BEEP!
- RCSaunders
- Posts: 4704
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Christianity
Good question. What do you think?henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 2:43 pmwho is which?