Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
Age wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:54 pm
If one does NOT ANSWER CLARIFY QUESTIONS posed to them, then I can NOT participate meaningfully in discussions with "others", in this forum,
Yes, you could. There are basic things you could do to make this experience much better for other people and much better for yourself. I'll list you a few.
You STILL DO NOT GET IT "immanuel can".
How this IS PROGRESSING is working PERFECTLY. So, this experience can NOT get ANY better for 'Me' nor for "others".
WHEN will you UNDERSTAND that 'this experience' is NOT ALL about 'you', and what 'you' WANT and DESIRE for 'you', personally.
We ALREADY KNOW that 'you' BELIEVE the Everything SHOULD revolve AROUND 'you'. This can be CLEARLY SEEN in your writings and discussions. BUT, 'this experience' is NOT about 'you' AT ALL. 'This experience' is USING 'you' to ACHIEVE what 'it' is that 'we' ALL WANT and DESIRE. Which, AGAIN, is proceeding 'quite nicely', or, in other words, PERFECTLY exactly as it is.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
Firstly, you should consider that not every statement in a post requires any "clarification."
Consider the Fact that if you can NOT 'clarify' absolutely EVERY statement in your posts, then you do NOT REALLY ACTUALLY KNOW what you are TALKING ABOUT.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
Some are clear as they stand.
And, some are "as clear as mud", as some say.
By the way, I OBVIOUSLY do "require" 'clarification' of EVERY statement. This is just MORE of your DECEPTIVE manner, and Falsifying CLAIMS, which has become a REAL BAD HABIT of yours now.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
The tendency to interrogate every little detail comes across not as perceptive or interested, but as irrational and hostile.
Is this so, for you?
The ABILITY to KNOW, and POINT OUT and SHOW, EXACTLY WHERE, in EVERY little detail, Falsehoods and/or fallacies, literally, lie can be VERY ANNOYING to those that did NOT previously KNOW those 'lies' where laying in there, or when they were 'trying to' HIDE those 'lies'.
Also, and as I have INVITED MANY TIMES PREVIOUSLY, if there is ANY, perceived, 'irrationality' or 'hostility' in absolutely ANY word I SAY or WRITE, then just POINT them OUT and REVEAL them here. I am MORE than WILLING to ENGAGE in MEANINGFUL DISCUSSIONS about 'them'.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
You need to reign yourself in, and be selective: what is the main point of a message, and what is worth interrogating.
I do NOT 'need' to do ANY such thing.
I am EXPRESSING MY MESSAGES EXACTLY HOW and WHEN I WANT TO, UNDERSTOOD?
The MAIN POINT of MY MESSAGE, I EXPRESS, if I WANT TO, and what is WORTH INTERROGATING I INTERROGATE.
That you are completely AND utterly INCAPABLE of 'countering' ANY of MY MESSAGES and INTERROGATIONS is of absolutely NO concern to me AT ALL.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
Ask only
the question that matters, not every "clarifying question" that pops into your head.
DO NOT TELL ME WHAT OR WHAT NOT TO DO, OKAY?
And, EVERY QUESTION I ASK MATTERS. As will SOON ENOUGH come to LIGHT.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
Secondly, people have told you how unpleasant the CAPs are, and how they don't apppreciate your overuse of them.
'overuse" is A PERCEPTION and RELATIVE to the observer.
Also, people have told you how unpleasant your CONDESCENDING tone IS, how unpleasant your LIES and DECEPTIONS ARE, and how they do NOT appreciate the way you DO these things.
But, like me, we write how we CHOOSE to write, correct?
I am NOT here to 'please' 'you', posters. I have MY GOAL and I am STICKING to IT, okay?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
They're not serving the purpose you imagine they are:
AND, what 'purpose' are they, that you are IMAGINING I am IMAGINING they are?
If you EVER spend the time to IMAGINE what that is EXACTLY, then you WILL SEE just how ABSURD and RIDICULOUS your CLAIM is here.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
instead of emphasizing what you're feeling, they're irritating people.
Here we have AGAIN ANOTHER EXAMPLE of ALL this ASSUMING, without ANY substantiate support. As well as ANOTHER EXAMPLE of 'trying to' CONTINUE on DEFLECTING from the Fact this one is ABSOLUTELY and TOTALLY USELESS in being able to back up and support the CLAIMS 'it' MAKES in relation to 'me' and MY WORDS here.
I suggest INSTEAD of ASSUMING I am emphasizing what I am "feeling" you GAIN CLARITY FIRST. That way you will NOT be SO WRONG, SO OFTEN as you ARE.
Also, how about instead of you writing what you ASSUME is true you instead write ONLY what you KNOW is true?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
And you can tell that's right, because I'm far from being the first person you've heard that from. It's time you believed us.
But I have absolutely NO reason to dispute ANY of you are 'right' in regards to just how IRRITATING I APPEAR to ANY of 'you', posters.
Thee Fact is I just do NOT CARE if I am or not.
WHEN I SEE ANY of one 'you' write some 'thing that is OBVIOUSLY False, Wrong, and/or Incorrect, then I CAN and I WILL POINT OUT and SHOW 'them', that is; if I so CHOOSE to do so. And, I WILL do this in CAPITAL LETTERS or NOT without absolutely ANY concern AT ALL if that IRRITATES 'you', "immanuel can", or ANY one else, okay?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
Thirdly, find ways to be positive about whatever is positive in somebody else's message.
Have you EVER considered following your OWN advice here?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
That doesn't mean you can't interrogate -- it means that a steady diet of nothing but interrogation comes across as pointlessly fractious and hostile.
Absolutely EVERY thing is relative to the observer. And, if this is what you SEE, then so be it.
JUST MAYBE if my Truly OPEN CLARIFYING QUESTIONS (or what you call "interrogation") were answered, then what might come to LIGHT, and thus be SEEN, was NOT ANY 'hostility' AT ALL, but RATHER the True intention behind the OPEN questioning.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
And it makes responding far too much work for most people to bother -- and that's why most of what you write elicits no response.
If it is, SUPPOSEDLY, "too much work" for 'you' to bother to respond, then what 'you' have been SAYING MUST NOT REALLY be of that much IMPORTANCE anyway.
If one does NOT want to spend some time and effort in backing up and supporting what they had PREVIOUSLY WRITTEN and CLAIMED, then this probably SHOWS far more about how little 'credence' that ACTUALLY give to what they SAID.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
Fourthly, "LOL" is a styling of children, not adults.
You do NOT even KNOW what LOL stands for.
And, it is ONLY thee Truly MATURED who KNOW to ASK for CLARITY BEFORE they make ASSUMPTIONS about absolutely ANY thing AT ALL.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
It serves no purpose in your messages except to make them look childish.
Who or what is 'them' here?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
You should drop that completely.
LOL "yes sir or madam".
You REALLY can NOT get rid of your LEARNED CONDESCENDING manner, correct?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
Also, get rid of the adolescent "you adults" thing, and the childish "alien" talk. Nobody's buying it. You can see that. It's just making you look petulant, and that's not the way you want to come across, is it?
What does the word 'petulant' here even mean or refer to, to you?
And, the VERY REAL REASON WHY I write EXACTLY the way I do is SOON to come-to-light.
Which, by the way, is just about NOTHING like what you have been ASSUMING all along.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
Fifthly, conversation is not a combat sport. When people put out a proposition, the are often inviting your opinion -- which could be either positive or critical, but should always be polite. They're giving you a compliment and a privilege in responding to you; it's rude to come back at them with nothing but cynicism or negativity.
IF 'you' SEE 'cynicism' or 'negativity' are 'you' now BLAMING 'me' for what 'you', "yourself", SEE?
And, if 'you' responding to me MEANS 'you' are giving me a compliment, and LOL a privilege, then does this ALSO MEAN that when you do NOT give me a response you are NOT complimenting me NOR giving me a privilege?
And, if it is the 'response', itself that gives the compliment and the privilege, then I MUST give 'you', "immanuel can", and "others" here, MUCH MORE compliments AND privileges that ANY of 'you' give me.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
Find ways to build their view up, in any way that it deserves to be built up, and keep the criticism for only those few things that really, really need it.
Will you PROVIDE EXAMPLES of when I have, supposedly, "criticized" "other's" views?
If no, then WHY NOT?
Also, and by the way, are you ALSO finding ways to build up my views, and in ANY way that they deserve to be built up, or are you 'criticizing' just about EVERY thing I do here?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
Even then, you can be polite.
Have I EVER NOT been polite?
If yes, then WHERE and WHEN?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
Focus on the topic, and never insult the person unless you're ready to write them off for good.
How much longer are you going to gone on in ANOTHER ATTEMPT of 'yours' to DEFLECT AWAY from the Fact that you have NOT YET, anyway, been ABLE to counter ANY thing I have SAID in regards to YOUR WORDS?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
I could give you more hints: but this is enough for now.
Okay.
And I will TAKE one of your hints and keep it VERY SIMPLE, for you.
Focus on the ACTUAL QUESTIONS I put forward to you and just ANSWER them Truly Honestly. That way you will NOT make it SO OBVIOUS that you are 'trying to' HIDE 'things' here.
Also, when you MAKE A CLAIM here it is MUCH BETTER for you that you are ABLE TO back up and support that CLAIM BEFORE you even begin to WRITE IT OUT HERE, for ALL to SEE.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
You need to correct your communication style, so as to win more friends and allies, and to make fewer pointless enemies.
STILL you do NOT GET IT.
I am NOT here to "win" ANY friends from 'you', posters.
I am ONLY using 'you', posters, here to POINT OUT and SHOW just HOW human beings used to mis/behavior back in those days, and what NOT to do, in order to keep the future progressing towards thee Truly PEACEFUL 'world' that WE ALL WANT and DESIRE.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
I think you'll be happier with your experience here when you do.
I suggest NOT "worrying" about 'me' AT ALL and ONLY concerning "yourself" with 'you' here.
The GOAL I had set is progressing along PERFECTLY HERE-NOW. So, what EXACTLY is 'it', which you think or BELIEVE could make me more HAPPIER?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
I know how you're going to take all this: you're going to assume it's meant as hostile.
LOL So, you make an ASSUMPTION about what I am "going to assume". Which, considering ALL of things that I have SAID about ASSUMING, and how I do NOT like to make ANY assumptions AT ALL, the ABSURDNESS of your statement here is even MORE BLINDINGLY STUPID.
Now, WHY, EXACTLY, would I even begin to ASSUME that your response here is 'hostile' in ANY way AT ALL?
From what I have SEEN from your response here, 'you' are ATTEMPTING to come across as all 'nice and sweet', like a 'fatherly figure' advising the 'poor little stupid, rebellious child how to behave better so more people will like you and so that you can "win" or gain more friends", and be "much more happier".
All while REALLY 'trying to' just DECEIVE and DETRACT AWAY from your OWN FAILINGS.
I NEVER even began to think it was, let alone EVER ASSUMED it was.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
Sometimes, only your best friends will tell you the truth. In this case, everything I'm telling you can help you to become much more effective on this forum.
WHEN will you GRASP the Fact that I am NOT writing in this forum to be effective on this forum?
ONCE AGAIN, I am USING this forum, 'you', posters, to HELP IN ACHIEVING what 'it' is that I AM ACHIEVING.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
If I were hostile, if I were writing you off, I would not have any reason to bother telling you all this...
Which is REALLY quite LAUGHABLE and CONTRADICTORY considering EVERY time I POINT OUT and SHOW YOUR FALLACIES, your think and/or write;
"I am not bothering".
BUT, when you want HAND OUT ADVICE and NEGLECT EVERY thing that I have SAID and POINTED OUT, then you WILL 'bother'.
The MORE 'you' PRETEND the MORE BLATANT YOUR CONTRADICTIONS and HYPOCRISIES STAND OUT.
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
especially since I have every reason to expect a hostile response from you, if history is any indicator.
Now here we have ANOTHER ASSUMPTION and ANOTHER NEW CLAIM.
WILL you THIS TIME provide ANY EXAMPLES of WHEN and WHERE I have, supposedly, provided a 'hostile response', to you?
If no, then WHY NOT?
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:23 pm
Best wishes as you go forward. I promise you, you'll be happier if you change than if you keep up what you're doing.
"happier" in regards to, or in relation to, 'what', EXACTLY?
Your ABILITY, or INABILITY, to be Honest here WILL SHOW just how much, or how little, you REALLY KNOW.
Oh, and before I forget, from ALL of this DISTRACTING you are DOING HERE, let us NOT FORGET that you CLAIMED that you COULD so easily PROVE my replies Wrong and so easily contest what I write, YET, we ARE STILL WAITING for you TO DO SO. So, WHY IS THIS, AGAIN?