Christianity

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Nick_A »

Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 2:25 am
Nick_A wrote: Mon Aug 15, 2022 11:14 pm After 400 posts we still don't know the purpose of Christianity.
Well, plausibly, it's been offered...but among the hordes of wrong ideas and bad answers, it may have gone unnoticed anyway.

Your better strategy is to research it for yourself. Otherwise, how will you recognize the right answer when you hear it?
Does a person learn about Christianity and devolve it into self serving indoctrination or can they remember it through revelation. Indoctrination versus remembrance? Which is the more common?
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Nick_A »

Harbal wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 11:11 am
Veritas Aequitas wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:55 am
In the future, we need to wean off all religions, i.e. we merely have to incorporate Buddhist fundamentals with other positive spiritual elements without any need for a specific religion.
Why do we have to? Am I unusual in that I don't have any inclinations towards "spirituality"? I'm not even sure what people mean by the term. Maybe I do have a sense of spirituality, but think of it as something else, I don't know. What purpose does spirituality serve in a person's life?
What purpose does the cosmic religious feeling have in a person's life? It is everything for those who have experienced it and nothing for those who are yet to experience it.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 22257
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Immanuel Can »

Nick_A wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:02 pm Does a person learn about Christianity and devolve it into self serving indoctrination or can they remember it through revelation.
It's not logical to make those the alternatives.

There are better options, like studying it out for oneself.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Nick_A »

Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:35 pm
Nick_A wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:02 pm Does a person learn about Christianity and devolve it into self serving indoctrination or can they remember it through revelation.
It's not logical to make those the alternatives.

There are better options, like studying it out for oneself.
Why do you think the Apostles dropped everything to follow Jesus? Was it because of what they learned or did the Christ through a quality of energy, let them experience the inner direction or the awakening purpose of Christianity?
Belinda
Posts: 8034
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:13 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Belinda »

Nick_A wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 6:48 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:35 pm
Nick_A wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:02 pm Does a person learn about Christianity and devolve it into self serving indoctrination or can they remember it through revelation.
It's not logical to make those the alternatives.

There are better options, like studying it out for oneself.
Why do you think the Apostles dropped everything to follow Jesus? Was it because of what they learned or did the Christ through a quality of energy, let them experience the inner direction or the awakening purpose of Christianity?
Jesus was a main exponent of a trend to extend Judaism so that a man's good intention (charity) mattered more than observance of the Judaic rituals .The Disciples were followers of a leader however all of the Jewish Christians were oriented towards what the Prophets began.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 22257
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Immanuel Can »

Nick_A wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 6:48 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:35 pm
Nick_A wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:02 pm Does a person learn about Christianity and devolve it into self serving indoctrination or can they remember it through revelation.
It's not logical to make those the alternatives.

There are better options, like studying it out for oneself.
Why do you think the Apostles dropped everything to follow Jesus?
Read, and see.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Nick_A »

Belinda wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 7:14 pm
Nick_A wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 6:48 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:35 pm
It's not logical to make those the alternatives.

There are better options, like studying it out for oneself.
Why do you think the Apostles dropped everything to follow Jesus? Was it because of what they learned or did the Christ through a quality of energy, let them experience the inner direction or the awakening purpose of Christianity?
Jesus was a main exponent of a trend to extend Judaism so that a man's good intention (charity) mattered more than observance of the Judaic rituals .The Disciples were followers of a leader however all of the Jewish Christians were oriented towards what the Prophets began.
Are you suggesting that Jesus appealed to the "good intentions" of the Apostles sufficient for them to drop everything, previously important to them, and follow Jesus?
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Nick_A »

Belinda wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 7:14 pm
Nick_A wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 6:48 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:35 pm
It's not logical to make those the alternatives.

There are better options, like studying it out for oneself.
Why do you think the Apostles dropped everything to follow Jesus? Was it because of what they learned or did the Christ through a quality of energy, let them experience the inner direction or the awakening purpose of Christianity?
Jesus was a main exponent of a trend to extend Judaism so that a man's good intention (charity) mattered more than observance of the Judaic rituals .The Disciples were followers of a leader however all of the Jewish Christians were oriented towards what the Prophets began.
It has been said that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Is Jesus really just promoting the road to hell?
Veritas Aequitas
Posts: 12357
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Veritas Aequitas »

Harbal wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 11:11 am
Veritas Aequitas wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 4:55 am
In the future, we need to wean off all religions, i.e. we merely have to incorporate Buddhist fundamentals with other positive spiritual elements without any need for a specific religion.
Why do we have to? Am I unusual in that I don't have any inclinations towards "spirituality"? I'm not even sure what people mean by the term. Maybe I do have a sense of spirituality, but think of it as something else, I don't know. What purpose does spirituality serve in a person's life?
'Spirituality' is a very loose term, thus I can understand your apprehension upon the sight of this word.

'Spirituality' to me means the wholeness and holistic approach in generating synergy to optimize one well being.
A human being is a system within system within bigger system and so on.
As such to optimize one's well being one will have to effectively align all of one's sub-systems with one whole human system and all other systems.

For example, spirituality in terms of nutrition would mean sustaining on a balanced diet in alignment with one's current conditions.

Buddhism has the Noble 8 Fold paths [NFP] [Right Knowledge, Understanding/View, Right Thought, Right Speech, Right Action, Right Livelihood, Right Effort, Right Mindfulness and Right Concentration ], thus spirituality in that sense would mean exercising the N8P effectively.

Note:
Buddhism's 4NT-8FP is a Life Problem Solving Technique.
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=25193

In the future we need to wean off all religions and their -ve baggage, but there's a lot of positives from Buddhism which we could retain for self-development without any association to a religion but merely in terms of 'spirituality' [as defined above].
Belinda
Posts: 8034
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:13 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Belinda »

Nick_A wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 10:58 pm
Belinda wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 7:14 pm
Nick_A wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 6:48 pm

Why do you think the Apostles dropped everything to follow Jesus? Was it because of what they learned or did the Christ through a quality of energy, let them experience the inner direction or the awakening purpose of Christianity?
Jesus was a main exponent of a trend to extend Judaism so that a man's good intention (charity) mattered more than observance of the Judaic rituals .The Disciples were followers of a leader however all of the Jewish Christians were oriented towards what the Prophets began.
Are you suggesting that Jesus appealed to the "good intentions" of the Apostles sufficient for them to drop everything, previously important to them, and follow Jesus?
I think the Gospels are to an extent(especially John) not historical records, but devotional books. Consequently the the most prudent way to glean the Gospels for facts is to do so primed with a little modern history and anthropology.

if you read the Gospels for a devotional purpose then okay, but don't then quarrel with historical anthropological approach.
Belinda
Posts: 8034
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:13 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Belinda »

Nick_A wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 2:41 am
Belinda wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 7:14 pm
Nick_A wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 6:48 pm

Why do you think the Apostles dropped everything to follow Jesus? Was it because of what they learned or did the Christ through a quality of energy, let them experience the inner direction or the awakening purpose of Christianity?
Jesus was a main exponent of a trend to extend Judaism so that a man's good intention (charity) mattered more than observance of the Judaic rituals .The Disciples were followers of a leader however all of the Jewish Christians were oriented towards what the Prophets began.
It has been said that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Is Jesus really just promoting the road to hell?
You are right and I did not express myself very well . The following is the sort of idea I have in mind:
1 Samuel 16:7
New International Version
7 But the Lord said to Samuel, “Do not consider his appearance or his height, for I have rejected him. The Lord does not look at the things people look at. People look at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart.”
By "good intentions" I meant those motivations that are often unspoken: basic principles that are not only believed but also felt.
Harry Baird
Posts: 1077
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 4:14 pm

Re: Christianity

Post by Harry Baird »

Alexis Jacobi wrote: Tue Aug 02, 2022 3:16 pm I’d like to hear more from [Harry].
You're in luck: Hopalong Harry and the Hopscotch Hotties are currently taking requests. What would you like us to play for you? An old favourite? One of our current hits? Or a new, original number especially customised to your preferences?
User avatar
Alexis Jacobi
Posts: 5145
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:00 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Alexis Jacobi »

Immanuel Can wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 2:25 am
Nick_A wrote: Mon Aug 15, 2022 11:14 pm After 400 posts we still don't know the purpose of Christianity.
Well, plausibly, it's been offered...but among the hordes of wrong ideas and bad answers, it may have gone unnoticed anyway.

Your better strategy is to research it for yourself. Otherwise, how will you recognize the right answer when you hear it?
No, in fact it has not really been offered, or revealed, or made plain, because the central fact is that religiousness has hit a wall. But let us suppose that there is a God that overrules existence, and our existence -- I must express it like this because, truthfully, there are conscious perspectives that are highly respectable which negate the necessity of *believing in* God. It is quite possible today to be an atheist and to get on just fine and it is just as possible not to give any particular thought to God. I do not think that such a stance negates 'spiritual life' if that is taken to mean living in a spirited, aware & conscious state. So it seems to me that what we are facing is a very real shift in essential perceptual modes.

To say *religiousness has hit a wall* means that the purpose of religion, the reason for getting involved in it, is no longer clear. So in fact what we see is (many) people who exist within this perceptual mode, and in a sense suffer in it (in the sense of suffering the wiping-away of the 'horizons' Nietzsche referred to and facing reality in a certain nakedness and vulnerability), come to a point of desperation, a crisis of soul, an existential crisis, and in that state then take action which may involve, and seems to involve, seeking out a religious community and religious ritual as a means to buttress themselves against something like *chaos*.

The fact of the matter is that it is existential crisis that is the real issue. And existential crisis requires, or provokes, response. Now, the fact of the matter is, when we examine the cultural landscape (the present state of affairs in the US is my reference-point) the entire culture is subsumed in a Criss of real proportion. It is as if the ground has shifted so quickly, and so radically, that -- think about it -- people have clearly lost their bearings. And therefore I think it is better (more productive to this conversation) to focus on that loss of bearing. That is the real condition that people face. Now one could say that *if there if a God* that this God stands behind this event in its fullest sense. How could it be otherwise? I think this points in the direction of strange shifts in god-definition. On one hand you have those solid and dependable images or 'pictures' of God as a pillar of stability and as a place of refuge to which one can retreat. But in fact the very realm that we are in, this terrestrial existence, is the realm where we experience what reality is. And in that experience stability is threatened.

So what is the function of God? You have to ask yourself about the sort of *tools* that you yourself seek to make it through this world. Usually, knowledge is power. One desires to become more qualified, more adept, more skilled, more accomplished in order to live successfully. What is the main skill sought? What else could it be but an increase in consciousness, awareness and if you like of power: but I do not mean this in a brutal way. I mean creative power; power that comes from awareness.

Within this conversation our own Immanuel Can has (I think it fair to say) completely failed in nearly every aspect of the needed confrontation with 'reality' -- the real conditions we are ow facing. What he seems to call for, and this is the Evangelical Christian manoeuvre, is a bone fide jumping back into familiar tropes or familiar group-strategies for dealing with chaos, confusion, uncertainty and the radical loss of grounding I refer to. So the God that he imagines (Jesus of Nazareth and the Holy Spirit) are presented as, in a sense, an escape from the real conditions that are faced. And again I use the word imagine in a special sense since it is only and strictly in our 'imagined space' where we conceive of God and, let's say, interact with God.

And so we clearly notice that the god-believers are grouping together and networking among themselves, preparing themselves, for a take-over of the present cultural and governmental situation which is seen as chaotic and, let's face it, as overruled by demonic entity. Satan is loose upon the world. He is determining the loss of integrity which produces a shattered, confused person who falls apart in the world. There is not enough 'center' for a person to rally around -- and I mean within their own self. I think this is what Nick has referred to as the division within the person and the soul.

Now what seems to be on the threshold -- here I am speaking culturally and existentially (and again my reference point is the social situation in the US which seems to capture the world (or is this only because the media-systems are so US-centered?) is the retaking of the power of government from a bizarre and radical faction. The "Democrats" has become a general term for radical, sexual deviant, 'Marxist' underminer of an established order and, as things are playing out, a general field of opposition of coalescing in order to confront what they describe as 'the Swamp'. This is seen and described as 'the Devil's Terrritory' and onto that image is projected all manner of content.

So I have made an effort here to allude realistically to the psycho-spiritual conditions that we are all facing while this rather abstract conversation has been going on. We are not so much talking about a general and constant 'religiousness' that could be defined as a general outline of what religious life should be, but about ourselves in the present conditions which are anything but clear.
User avatar
Alexis Jacobi
Posts: 5145
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:00 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Alexis Jacobi »

Harry Baird wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 10:21 am
Alexis Jacobi wrote: Tue Aug 02, 2022 3:16 pm I’d like to hear more from [Harry].
You're in luck: Hopalong Harry and the Hopscotch Hotties are currently taking requests. What would you like us to play for you? An old favourite? One of our current hits? Or a new, original number especially customised to your preferences?
I dunno. But maybe something along these lines?
Dubious
Posts: 4000
Joined: Tue May 19, 2015 7:40 am

Re: Christianity

Post by Dubious »

Alexis Jacobi wrote: Wed Aug 17, 2022 2:36 pm

So I have made an effort here to allude realistically to the psycho-spiritual conditions that we are all facing while this rather abstract conversation has been going on. We are not so much talking about a general and constant 'religiousness' that could be defined as a general outline of what religious life should be, but about ourselves in the present conditions which are anything but clear.
...in which god and religion itself has become an existential quandary.
Post Reply