Reading comprehension failureAge wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 12:26 amSo, if I was to say to you, Will you prove this CLAIM here of yours?, are you still under the DELUSION that I "clearly can not tell when you are making a claim? Or, are you now going to make the claim that that was NOT a claim that you were making?Atla wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 1:47 pmYou clearly can't tell when I'm making a claim.Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 1:29 pm
Yes I have mentioned this also. But I worded in a way like, I suggest you have the PROOF to back up and support YOUR CLAIMS, BEFORE you ACTUALLY make the CLAIM. That way you will NOT be AS WRONG AS YOU ARE, as OFTEN AS YOU ARE.
What PROOF would you like?
AND, do NOT forget that 'the burden of proof' only exists AFTER proof is asked for.
Okay, if you say so.
Prove that the One true Self is always achieving.
These two sentences of yours here appear somewhat CONTRADICTORY. That is; to 'you', 'I' am an IDIOT, and, to 'you', the burden of proof ALWAYS EXISTS among the NON-IDIOTS. So, for 'you' to ask an IDIOT to prove that the One True Self (with capital T, by the way) is always achieving, as though the burden of proof was on 'me' - THE IDIOT, appears CONTRADICTORY.
'you', "atla", are the NON-IDIOT, correct?
If yes, then the burden of proof ALWAYS EXISTS among 'you', (well according to 'your' "logic", and CLAIM here, that is.)
incorrect again, unlike you I genuinely have zero certain beliefsThe PROOF that thee One True Self is achieving is VERIFIED through the OBSERVATIONS and the EXPERIENCES of the human body of the 'world'/Universe outside of that body.
But to be ABLE TO AGREE WITH and ACCEPT this PROOF one first has to KNOW what thee One True Self IS, EXACTLY. And, if I am correct, 'you', "atla", do NOT YET KNOW who NOR what this One IS, right?
And, if I am right here, then this is BECAUSE 'you', "atla" BELIEVE WHOLEHEARTEDLY that there is NO One True Self that exists, correct?
Clarifying question: what is thee One True Self, EXACTLY?