Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 2:34 am
Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 1:55 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 9:02 pm
It is a truth that not everyone agrees on a specific thing yet this truth is singular.
If you are going speak like this and use the second 'a' word here, like you have to either to 'try to' deflect away from the actual point I made, or not, you still need to provide 'an' example so that we can LOOK AT that 'one' to then be able to DISCUSS if there are OTHER 'ones' besides that ONE VERY PARTICULAR ONE that you are thinking about.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 9:02 pm
The one exists through the many.
The one WHAT, exists through the many WHAT?
1. You are projecting your own deflection.
REALLY?
Some can SEE and are SAYING that this appears to be an attempt at DEFLECTION, projected, itself.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 2:34 am
The truth is that there are many truths and this truth is a singular entity as a singular truth.
OF COURSE, there are MANY, so called, "truths". Each and EVERY one of 'you', adult human beings, has and holds their OWN, so called, "truth".
Also, so if 'this truth' is a singular entity as a 'singular truth', then does that mean that 'this truth' is irrefutable?
If yes, then does that now make 'this irrefutable truth' absolute?
And if yes, then would that now make 'this irrefutable and absolute truth', 'A truth of things'?
If yes, the I just refer to this kind or type of 'truth' as 'thee ACTUAL Truth of things', or shortened, 'thee Truth', which just makes expressing 'that thing' SIMPLER and EASIER.
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 2:34 am
2. The singular totality of being exists through many grades/images, each grade/image is a microcosm of the macrocosm.
OF COURSE.
Contrary to YOUR BELIEF 'this' has NEVER been DISPUTED.
What I did was ask you to PROVIDE an EXAMPLE of the 'a "specific thing", which you were 'trying to' CLAIM NOT everyone agrees with, which you THEN 'tried to' CLAIM was "one singular truth".
Talk about DEFLECTION.
To me, there are SOME 'things' that EVERY one does AGREE ON, so if this is True, then that would REFUTE your CLAIM here. And then, this THE OPPOSITE of YOUR CLAIM would NOW become 'one singular (irrefutable and absolute) Truth. Surely this NOT to HARD NOR COMPLEX to UNDERSTAND?
Also, the ONLY other thing I did here was to ask you, 'one WHAT, exists though many WHAT/S?'
What can be SEEN here is you have FAILED to answer my CLARIFYING QUESTION posed to you, as well as FAILING to PROVIDE an EXAMPLE of what I CHALLENGED you about.
Now, if you had been Truly OPEN and Honest, by PROVIDING BOTH the EXAMPLE and the ANSWER, then we could have come together in AGREEMENT, MUCH EARLIER, MUCH SIMPLER, MUCH QUICKER, and MUCH EASIER than we are going to now.