But the proof already exists that something did not, and could not, come from nothing. The proof that thee One and ONLY Universe is infinite and eternal already exists.
To say something comes from a prior being is to say one thing results in the variation of another thing.
Okay.
Who, exactly, says, "something comes from a prior being", by the way?
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:42 pm
Being from being is variation where the new phenomenon is a variation of the prior. This variation necessitates one phenomenon as having something another phenomenon lacks. This lack, as an absence, necessitates a void between phenomena. This void appears prior to the new phenomena as that which seperates it from the old, thus these new changes result in being coming from nothing at the same time being comes from being.
What, exactly, does the word 'being' mean or refer to, to you?
To say something comes from a prior being is to say one thing results in the variation of another thing.
Okay.
Who, exactly, says, "something comes from a prior being", by the way?
Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon May 31, 2021 5:42 pm
Being from being is variation where the new phenomenon is a variation of the prior. This variation necessitates one phenomenon as having something another phenomenon lacks. This lack, as an absence, necessitates a void between phenomena. This void appears prior to the new phenomena as that which seperates it from the old, thus these new changes result in being coming from nothing at the same time being comes from being.
What, exactly, does the word 'being' mean or refer to, to you?
1. Those who say being does not come from void.
BUT, if one says this, then that does NOT mean that they are saying, "something comes from a prior being".
They may be saying, 'something comes from at least two other prior physical things coming together", instead.
And, to those people, those 'physical things' may not be 'beings' at all.
Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 01, 2021 11:52 am
2. Being is that which has form.
So, a slab of concrete is a 'being', to you, correct?
Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 9:34 pm
It would be pointless of me to argue with an idiot.
You are too stupid to understand the most simple thing.
Grrrrr...someone lost their thinking cap.
To get back on track a slab of concrete both acts and has form therefore is a being. Being is that which acts and has form.
A slab of concrete is not "a being".
Pretty much all the threads you contrinute to, or start ,are all about this sort of basic abuse of language.
It acts. A being is that which acts. A slab of concrete is a being and as one facet of being it reflects all of being as having a degree of consciousness.
Pretty much all the threads you contribute to or start reflects this close mindedness an absence of any deeper or original thought.
To get back on track a slab of concrete both acts and has form therefore is a being. Being is that which acts and has form.
A slab of concrete is not "a being".
Pretty much all the threads you contrinute to, or start ,are all about this sort of basic abuse of language.
It acts. Being is that which acts. A slab of concrete is a being and as one facet of being it reflects all of being as having a degree of consciousness.
No concrete cannot "ACT". You are once again confusing two different meanings of act, just like you confuse two meanings of being.
If you can't be bothered to think. I can't be bothered to respond to this nonsense.