One can be superpositioned much in the same manner a point is superpositioned through a line given the same point with which the line begins is the same it ends by.Fja1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 10:42 pmTo me, all you're saying is that being is conceived as an interval, which defines the unsurpassable limits of its freedom. An argument of epistomology, not ontology. I can not be in place x, and place y, at the same time, but the gap beween place x and y exists only epistemologically. Ontologically, if I am in place x, the void is place y. Ontologically, nothingness is supported by being, not the other way around.
Conceiving Nothing
Re: Conceiving Nothing
Re: Conceiving Nothing
Although conception can cease, nothing cannot be conceived because conception requires something.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 10:05 pm To conceive nothingness is to conceive a state which is void thus impressionable by any further percieved phenomena. In simpler terms to conceive of Nothingness is to conceive of a state which is open to all of being. Existence alone, in contrast to nothing, bears a truth value because it exists. We conceive of Nothingness by the acceptance of being alone considering any being which is accepted "as is" without thought given there is nothing behind the conceived being.
To conceive Nothingness is to conceive everything as there is nothing behind everything.
Re: Conceiving Nothing
Nothing being percieved is the absence of observation. The state of observation remains formless thus is impressionable to all of being.Walker wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 9:24 pmAlthough conception can cease, nothing cannot be conceived because conception requires something.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 10:05 pm To conceive nothingness is to conceive a state which is void thus impressionable by any further percieved phenomena. In simpler terms to conceive of Nothingness is to conceive of a state which is open to all of being. Existence alone, in contrast to nothing, bears a truth value because it exists. We conceive of Nothingness by the acceptance of being alone considering any being which is accepted "as is" without thought given there is nothing behind the conceived being.
To conceive Nothingness is to conceive everything as there is nothing behind everything.
Re: Conceiving Nothing
I hear you, but this is epistemology. In ontology, a circle is often thought of as rest, not movement. (As Schopenhauer and the greeks points out.)Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 6:56 pmOne can be superpositioned much in the same manner a point is superpositioned through a line given the same point with which the line begins is the same it ends by.Fja1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 10:42 pmTo me, all you're saying is that being is conceived as an interval, which defines the unsurpassable limits of its freedom. An argument of epistomology, not ontology. I can not be in place x, and place y, at the same time, but the gap beween place x and y exists only epistemologically. Ontologically, if I am in place x, the void is place y. Ontologically, nothingness is supported by being, not the other way around.
Re: Conceiving Nothing
... absence of observation, and observer.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 11:23 pmNothing being percieved is the absence of observation. The state of observation remains formless thus is impressionable to all of being.Walker wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 9:24 pmAlthough conception can cease, nothing cannot be conceived because conception requires something.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 10:05 pm To conceive nothingness is to conceive a state which is void thus impressionable by any further percieved phenomena. In simpler terms to conceive of Nothingness is to conceive of a state which is open to all of being. Existence alone, in contrast to nothing, bears a truth value because it exists. We conceive of Nothingness by the acceptance of being alone considering any being which is accepted "as is" without thought given there is nothing behind the conceived being.
To conceive Nothingness is to conceive everything as there is nothing behind everything.
*
Cognition, conception, perception, observation, comprehension, apprehension, causation … lots of angels on the pin-head.
Re: Conceiving Nothing
The circle is superpositioned points.Fja1 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 24, 2021 3:25 amI hear you, but this is epistemology. In ontology, a circle is often thought of as rest, not movement. (As Schopenhauer and the greeks points out.)Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 23, 2021 6:56 pmOne can be superpositioned much in the same manner a point is superpositioned through a line given the same point with which the line begins is the same it ends by.Fja1 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 10:42 pm
To me, all you're saying is that being is conceived as an interval, which defines the unsurpassable limits of its freedom. An argument of epistomology, not ontology. I can not be in place x, and place y, at the same time, but the gap beween place x and y exists only epistemologically. Ontologically, if I am in place x, the void is place y. Ontologically, nothingness is supported by being, not the other way around.