So you agree with the existence of something which dictates how reality should look like this, the so-called mind.
No, that is not what is meant by "mind" nor do I think that such a thing, call it what you will, could approach what anything "should" look like.
Reality is what it is. How could evolution produce a thing which could "dictate what a thing should"look like?vWho is to judge the should?
What do you mean with am I, a sequence of coherent events.
bahman wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 9:02 pm
So you agree with the existence of something which dictates how reality should look like this, the so-called mind.
No, that is not what is meant by "mind" nor do I think that such a thing, call it what you will, could approach what anything "should" look like.
Reality is what it is. How could evolution produce a thing which could "dictate what a thing should"look like?vWho is to judge the should?
What do you mean with am I, a sequence of coherent events.
This does not parse very well.
Did you mean to say:
What do you mean with "am I, a sequence of coherent events."?
No, that is not what is meant by "mind" nor do I think that such a thing, call it what you will, could approach what anything "should" look like.
Reality is what it is. How could evolution produce a thing which could "dictate what a thing should"look like?vWho is to judge the should?
What do you mean with am I, a sequence of coherent events.
This does not parse very well.
Did you mean to say:
What do you mean with "am I, a sequence of coherent events."?
I mean what do you mean with "am I", a sequence of coherent events?
bahman wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 9:20 pm
What do you mean with am I, a sequence of coherent events.
This does not parse very well.
Did you mean to say:
What do you mean with "am I, a sequence of coherent events."?
I mean what do you mean with "am I", a sequence of coherent events?
You are not very coherent.
If you want to challenge me on a quote, then find the exact place I am supposed have said it with the context in which it was written.
This does not parse very well.
Did you mean to say:
What do you mean with "am I, a sequence of coherent events."?
I mean what do you mean with "am I", a sequence of coherent events?
You are not very coherent.
If you want to challenge me on a quote, then find the exact place I am supposed have said it with the context in which it was written.
What do you mean with "am I"? Consciousness is not fundamental in materialism since it is the outcome of the matter process. Any instance of experience is an event. Therefore you are a sequence of coherent events in materialism.
bahman wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 11:39 pm
I mean what do you mean with "am I", a sequence of coherent events?
You are not very coherent.
If you want to challenge me on a quote, then find the exact place I am supposed have said it with the context in which it was written.
What do you mean with "am I"? Consciousness is not fundamental in materialism since it is the outcome of the matter process. Any instance of experience is an event. Therefore you are a sequence of coherent events in materialism.
Can't you read?
If you want to challenge me on a quote, then find the exact place I am supposed have said it with the context in which it was written.
IN OTHER WORDS: Where exactly did I say "am I"? . where, and what is the context?
The next three sentences say Consciousness is not fundamental since you are a sequence of coherent events in materialism.
What do you think I am supposed to tak away from that?
You are not very coherent.
If you want to challenge me on a quote, then find the exact place I am supposed have said it with the context in which it was written.
What do you mean with "am I"? Consciousness is not fundamental in materialism since it is the outcome of the matter process. Any instance of experience is an event. Therefore you are a sequence of coherent events in materialism.
Can't you read?
If you want to challenge me on a quote, then find the exact place I am supposed have said it with the context in which it was written.
IN OTHER WORDS: Where exactly did I say "am I"? . where, and what is the context?
Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 8:16 pm
The next three sentences say Consciousness is not fundamental since you are a sequence of coherent events in materialism.
What do you think I am supposed to take away from that?
Take what I wrote. Your conscious experience is a sequence of coherent events.
bahman wrote: ↑Fri May 07, 2021 8:05 pm
What do you mean with "am I"? Consciousness is not fundamental in materialism since it is the outcome of the matter process. Any instance of experience is an event. Therefore you are a sequence of coherent events in materialism.
Can't you read?
If you want to challenge me on a quote, then find the exact place I am supposed have said it with the context in which it was written.
IN OTHER WORDS: Where exactly did I say "am I"? . where, and what is the context?
If you want to challenge me on a quote, then find the exact place I am supposed have said it with the context in which it was written.
IN OTHER WORDS: Where exactly did I say "am I"? . where, and what is the context?