That too, probably, but he's claimed a background in computer/information science and I think that's plausible. If not, he at least has something like a very high functioning autistic's long-term obsession with computer/information science, enough that he'd have equivalent knowledge to someone with a degree and/or employment in the field, and enough to give him the "when you have a hammer" problem.tillingborn wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:21 pmReally? I just had him down as some incel with anger issues.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:12 pmHe has a background in computer/information science, and then a casual, hobbyist's interest in mathematics, science, philosophy, etc. That's it.
Prove An Independent Reality-in-Itself Exists
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Prove An Independent Reality-in-Itself Exists
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: Prove An Independent Reality-in-Itself Exists
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Prove An Independent Reality-in-Itself Exists
You'll notice that he gets more curt/ad hominemy when you peg stuff like this about him. It's part of a very predictable defense mechanism.
Re: Prove An Independent Reality-in-Itself Exists
I laughed alright.
That you've resorted to psychoanalysis (a non-science) to construct some character assassination.
Shame. The desperation.
Re: Prove An Independent Reality-in-Itself Exists
You mean like reach for pop-psychology to attack other people? Yeah. Retard.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:30 pm You'll notice that he gets more curt/ad hominemy when you peg stuff like this about him. It's part of a very predictable defense mechanism.
It's not a defence mechanism. It's a full-on attack mechanism.
Psychology lacks statistical rigour, reproducibility or significance. It's not a science.
Last edited by Skepdick on Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: Prove An Independent Reality-in-Itself Exists
It also makes him "flurry post"
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: Prove An Independent Reality-in-Itself Exists
In fairness he has done a bit of homework. Given the amount he posts, he clearly has a lot of time on his hands and nothing useful to do, but it all looks like a wikipedia trail to me.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:28 pmThat too, probably, but he's claimed a background in computer/information science and I think that's plausible. If not, he at least has something like a very high functioning autistic's long-term obsession with computer/information science, enough that he'd have equivalent knowledge to someone with a degree and/or employment in the field, and enough to give him the "when you have a hammer" problem.
Re: Prove An Independent Reality-in-Itself Exists
Skepdick doesn't know the first thing about computer/information science, he's just bluffing, but that's enough to fool people like Terrapin. What Skepdick does is, since his brain is somehow not capable of processing meaning/context/abstraction, he tries to read all English like it was computer code. Plus he's an incel with anger issues.tillingborn wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:21 pmReally? I just had him down as some incel with anger issues.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:12 pmHe has a background in computer/information science, and then a casual, hobbyist's interest in mathematics, science, philosophy, etc. That's it.
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: Prove An Independent Reality-in-Itself Exists
He also does an unusual amount of editing. Again, all the actual scientists I know are way more cautious and will scrutinise every detail before they submit for publication.
Re: Prove An Independent Reality-in-Itself Exists
You equate science with publication?!?! Ahahahahaha. Fucking academics.tillingborn wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:38 pmHe also does an unusual amount of editing. Again, all the actual scientists I know are way more cautious and will scrutinise every detail before they submit for publication.
You are confusing the narrative with the practice.
Birds don't need a theory of flying to tell them how to fly.
Scientists don't need a theory of science to tell them how to science.
Re: Prove An Independent Reality-in-Itself Exists
Look!Atla wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:36 pm Skepdick doesn't know the first thing about computer/information science, he's just bluffing, but that's enough to fool people like Terrapin. What Skepdick does is, since his brain is somehow not capable of processing meaning/context/abstraction, he tries to read all English like it was computer code. Plus he's an incel with anger issues.
Another character assassination attempt.
You are so pathetic
Come now! There's 3 of you. Lynch me already for rejecting your orthodoxy.
Last edited by Skepdick on Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: Prove An Independent Reality-in-Itself Exists
How can somebody so wrong feel no emotion about being wrong?
Not even anger at being wrong. Are you even human?
Last edited by Skepdick on Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:15 pm
Re: Prove An Independent Reality-in-Itself Exists
I have no intention of dying for my cause.
I have every intention for making you die for yours
If it comes to that.
P.S still stuck doing pop-psychology
Seems you are out of ideas.
Last edited by Skepdick on Sun Apr 11, 2021 12:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.