That's ironic and hilarious at the same time. You repetitively fail to contextualise your very own words.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Apr 11, 2021 1:34 pm Well and he would have to be able to not come across like a crank who can't grasp what other folks are talking about in a given context.
You keep avoiding ALL contextualisation:
* What is the point of your point?
* What is the utility of the words that you speak?
* What problem are you addressing/solving?
* What is the philosophy of Philosophy?
* Why are you philosophising about THAT?
* Who is this important to and why? (other than yourself?)
Philosophy without technical input is sophistry, technical developments without philosophy end up answering questions of no interest.