1. The "I" is continually changing time/space thus exists in multiple times/spaces.Age wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 7:42 amBut there is NO multiple 'time' nor 'spaces' of the 'I'.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 11:10 pm1. Multiple "I's" account for the multiple time and spaces of the "I".Age wrote: ↑Fri Mar 19, 2021 8:04 pm
But there is NO 'other' 'I'. There is ONLY One 'I'. In saying that, however, OF COURSE there are many 'i's'. But 'you', thee individual one here, seem to be MISSING this FACT.
'you', older human beings, do, however, seem to think that 'you', individually, are greater and more important than 'you' REALLY ARE. 'you' ALL do have a grandiose perspective of "yourselves". 'you' do see "yourselves" as the greater 'I', and as such do label "yourselves", and thus, literally, put "yourselves" as thee greater 'I'.
There are many of 'you', little individual 'i's, but, literally, without specific distinction made, 'you' are all the SAME.
If 'it', consciousness, can observe, then 'what', EXACTLY is 'consciousness'? 'Where', EXACTLY, is 'it'? 'How', EXACTLY does 'it' work? 'What', EXACTLY, is 'it' made of? And, 'when', EXACTLY, will 'it' reveal 'its' True Self?
When little old 'you' can express 'this' FULLY in a way that the rest of 'us' can FULLY understand, accept, and agree upon, then great.
But until then 'we' are ALL just trying to work ALL-OF-THIS out, in our OWN individual little ways.
'Who' and 'what', EXACTLY, is the 'I' here?
IF 'nature' IS Self Aware, then WHY does 'It' have so much trouble explaining this AWARENESS to 'you', human beings?
In other words, WHY is taking 'you', people, so long to catch up and KNOW Thy Self?
Prove to 'who'?
'I' have ALREADY proved 'this' to thy Self. BUT, of course, one can NOT prove ANY thing to ANY one who BELIEVES otherwise.
You, OBVIOUSLY, wrote what you did here from the perspective and BELIEF that 'this' could NOT be done, correct?
If this is NOT correct, then prove to 'me' that 'you' are Truly OPEN about HOW I could prove to 'you' that 'i' have ALREADY learned the, proper and correct, answer to the question 'Who am 'I'?'
In other words, 'what', EXACTLY, could I do to prove to 'you' that I have learned the answer to "who am I?"
BUT, if you did NOT inform us of what the definition and the meaning of the symbol is, to you, then I have NO idea NOR clue what you are, literally, pointing at. If you are going to define 'point' as the symbol ".", then I am NOT going to know what you are on about.
A '.', literally, does NOT 'point to ANY thing'. So, if you do NOT inform us of what the 'point' IS, exactly, then there is, literally, NO point, to the '.'.
Who cares?
AND, what is the actual 'point' in RE-REPEATING this same 'thing'?
There is only one 'time' and 'space' of and for the 'I'.
I agree that there is no same 'time' and 'space for the 'I', but then 'you' would have to have enough curiosity to discover WHY there now appears to be a contradiction in what I have just said here.
Oh, and by the way, there is NO multiple 'I's'. There is only One 'I'.
But what is 'time' and 'space', to 'you?
'I', and NOT 'i', is thee Only and ONLY One. In visible form 'I' is, or am, thee Universe, Itself, and 'I' is, or am, thee Mind, Itself.
For further clarification, and for actual proof of this, then just continue on with the clarifying questions.
To the point of 'what', EXACTLY?
To 'me', this sounds like you really do NOT know what you are talking about but are trying your very hardest to sound like you actually do.
2. Prove there is one "I" if "I" is existing in continually changing times/spaces and "I" is defined by the time space it is in.
3. Time is multiple spaces, space is axiomatic and accept as is as change.
4. Explain what the universe and mind is.
5. The point "•" as self referencing through further points. The point is the origin of all forms.
6. False. Being mirroring nothing is being, in all its unity negated. However considering being cannot be negated, considering there is only being, the grand unity of being results in multiple beings.