Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
1. All logic is dependent upon a series of selected assertions which are rooted within a sea of potentially selectable assertions. A computer cannot select which assertions to begin with.
2. All assertions are empty in themselves given they are dependent upon a progression to further assertions. This empty nature of the assertion is not programmable given the emptiness exists prior to computation. Computation is a byproduct of this empty nature but this emptiness is not programmable given emptiness is not programmable.
3. All assertions, as empty in themselves, are inherent middles to further assertions. This middle nature necessitates all assertions as center points to further assertions given the assertion leads to another assertion. Each assertion is a centerpoint and this nature of a centerpoint is not programmable.
4. Logic is thus rooted in a trifold nature: a chosen assertion, the emptiness of said assertion, and the assertion as a center point. This trifold nature to logic necessitates logic, at its roots, being unprogrammable.
1. All logic is dependent upon a series of selected assertions which are rooted within a sea of potentially selectable assertions. A computer cannot select which assertions to begin with.
2. All assertions are empty in themselves given they are dependent upon a progression to further assertions. This empty nature of the assertion is not programmable given the emptiness exists prior to computation. Computation is a byproduct of this empty nature but this emptiness is not programmable given emptiness is not programmable.
3. All assertions, as empty in themselves, are inherent middles to further assertions. This middle nature necessitates all assertions as center points to further assertions given the assertion leads to another assertion. Each assertion is a centerpoint and this nature of a centerpoint is not programmable.
4. Logic is thus rooted in a trifold nature: a chosen assertion, the emptiness of said assertion, and the assertion as a center point. This trifold nature to logic necessitates logic, at its roots, being unprogrammable.
-
- Posts: 2446
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 1:53 am
Re: Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
"Programmable"? This implies an expected programmer.
If you are trying to understand how nature's logic can initiate anything, it has to do with 'contradiction' as being the FORCE of nature. That is, given nothing, everything in such a state is 'true' for being certainly 'false' by our relative perception of it. But this is permissible where no being exists as a 'source'. Nature only appears to 'cause' but is actually just the set of continously infinite abstract possibilities that exist in nothingness. Then the patterns that define subsets of this Totality consistently, are such that can define a 'logic' ...a rule of the patterns that define what we call 'laws' of nature.
While I understand most here do not (or cannot) fathom reality to be just a manifestation of patterns, nature is just the mathematical expression of abstract possibilities based on nothing at all. ONLY this can assure reality exists. The alternative is to either claim some religious belief or just to remain agnostic for pragmatic reasons only.
As to 'programming', if you are thinking of how evolution operates, that is a pattern of 'self-programming': Whichever FITS the pattern of the particular world (subset of Totaltity), gets to survive where other options could have otherwise existed. Technically, no 'program' exists either. The patterns that remain consistent have LONGER extension than those that don't. Thus, if you maintain fitness to the pattern, you illusively interpret 'cause' as existing because of the fact that patterns seem to repeat from the perspective of being IN the 'pattern'.
If you are trying to understand how nature's logic can initiate anything, it has to do with 'contradiction' as being the FORCE of nature. That is, given nothing, everything in such a state is 'true' for being certainly 'false' by our relative perception of it. But this is permissible where no being exists as a 'source'. Nature only appears to 'cause' but is actually just the set of continously infinite abstract possibilities that exist in nothingness. Then the patterns that define subsets of this Totality consistently, are such that can define a 'logic' ...a rule of the patterns that define what we call 'laws' of nature.
While I understand most here do not (or cannot) fathom reality to be just a manifestation of patterns, nature is just the mathematical expression of abstract possibilities based on nothing at all. ONLY this can assure reality exists. The alternative is to either claim some religious belief or just to remain agnostic for pragmatic reasons only.
As to 'programming', if you are thinking of how evolution operates, that is a pattern of 'self-programming': Whichever FITS the pattern of the particular world (subset of Totaltity), gets to survive where other options could have otherwise existed. Technically, no 'program' exists either. The patterns that remain consistent have LONGER extension than those that don't. Thus, if you maintain fitness to the pattern, you illusively interpret 'cause' as existing because of the fact that patterns seem to repeat from the perspective of being IN the 'pattern'.
Re: Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
No. Logic is dependent upon the ability to discern causal links between events and/or phenomena.
If they were empty, there would be nothing to assert.2. All assertions are empty in themselves
No. Assertions serve different purposes in different situations.given they are dependent upon a progression to further assertions.
"Your pants are on fire." doesn't require any further progression.
The rest is equally vacuous.
What you're talking about is a particular kind of logical formula - and even that, out of context. Logic itself is way bigger and more pervasive than that. It starts with a paramecium thinking: My back end feels warmer than my front end. My back end feels better than my front end. Therefore, warm is better than cold.
A minute later, it came up with the first problem: How can all of me feel warm?
And then the first logical solution: I can swim backward, toward the warm.
Re: Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
Yes it is. The assertion at the core of logic is also known as a decision problem.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 12:49 am Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
1. All logic is dependent upon a series of selected assertions which are rooted within a sea of potentially selectable assertions. A computer cannot select which assertions to begin with.
2. All assertions are empty in themselves given they are dependent upon a progression to further assertions. This empty nature of the assertion is not programmable given the emptiness exists prior to computation. Computation is a byproduct of this empty nature but this emptiness is not programmable given emptiness is not programmable.
3. All assertions, as empty in themselves, are inherent middles to further assertions. This middle nature necessitates all assertions as center points to further assertions given the assertion leads to another assertion. Each assertion is a centerpoint and this nature of a centerpoint is not programmable.
4. Logic is thus rooted in a trifold nature: a chosen assertion, the emptiness of said assertion, and the assertion as a center point. This trifold nature to logic necessitates logic, at its roots, being unprogrammable.
A determination is the same thing as "choice function" in non-deterministic programming.
This ultimately boils down to the age old philosophical questions of determinism vs free will.
Neither of which precludes a programmer.
In quantum physics this is known as superdeterminism.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 9999
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
The inherent emptiness of said assertions is not programmable. The divergence and reconvergence of patterns exists beyond the program itself with any programming only mimicking the force of divergence and convergence which exists beyond it. This mimicking of divergence and convergence necessitates the program as being derived from nature. Programming is a recurssion of patterns, ie those from nature repeated into that of the program, thus necessitating recurssion as existing beyond the program.Scott Mayers wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:43 am "Programmable"? This implies an expected programmer.
If you are trying to understand how nature's logic can initiate anything, it has to do with 'contradiction' as being the FORCE of nature. That is, given nothing, everything in such a state is 'true' for being certainly 'false' by our relative perception of it. But this is permissible where no being exists as a 'source'. Nature only appears to 'cause' but is actually just the set of continously infinite abstract possibilities that exist in nothingness. Then the patterns that define subsets of this Totality consistently, are such that can define a 'logic' ...a rule of the patterns that define what we call 'laws' of nature.
While I understand most here do not (or cannot) fathom reality to be just a manifestation of patterns, nature is just the mathematical expression of abstract possibilities based on nothing at all. ONLY this can assure reality exists. The alternative is to either claim some religious belief or just to remain agnostic for pragmatic reasons only.
As to 'programming', if you are thinking of how evolution operates, that is a pattern of 'self-programming': Whichever FITS the pattern of the particular world (subset of Totaltity), gets to survive where other options could have otherwise existed. Technically, no 'program' exists either. The patterns that remain consistent have LONGER extension than those that don't. Thus, if you maintain fitness to the pattern, you illusively interpret 'cause' as existing because of the fact that patterns seem to repeat from the perspective of being IN the 'pattern'.
Re: Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
1. Yet which causal links observed are chosen from a series of causal links. There are an infinite number of causal links.Skip wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:47 amNo. Logic is dependent upon the ability to discern causal links between events and/or phenomena.
If they were empty, there would be nothing to assert.2. All assertions are empty in themselvesNo. Assertions serve different purposes in different situations.given they are dependent upon a progression to further assertions.
"Your pants are on fire." doesn't require any further progression.
The rest is equally vacuous.
What you're talking about is a particular kind of logical formula - and even that, out of context. Logic itself is way bigger and more pervasive than that. It starts with a paramecium thinking: My back end feels warmer than my front end. My back end feels better than my front end. Therefore, warm is better than cold.
A minute later, it came up with the first problem: How can all of me feel warm?
And then the first logical solution: I can swim backward, toward the warm.
2. "Empty in themselves" not empty. The assertions do not exist on their own terms but are dependent upon further assertions. On there own terms the assertion is vacuous.
3. "Your pants are on fire" during "x" time in "y" position at "z" spot is a necessary progression. "The flaming pants where put out" is another progression. Your example only proves the necessity of progression within any assertions that are manifested.
4. The logical formula is based upon the Munchauseen trilemma.
Last edited by Eodnhoj7 on Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
And what is fundamental in logic?attofishpi wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 10:04 amI'm sticking with - computers are programmable - LOGIC is fundamental and unchangeable.
Re: Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
Yet the choice is determined by a subsidiary program. The program which determines which subsidiary program will be used cannot be chosen except by another program beyond it, and one beyond that. Telling the computer how to make a choice necessitates the computer as not being able to completely exert free will in choice.Skepdick wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 8:33 amYes it is. The assertion at the core of logic is also known as a decision problem.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 12:49 am Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
1. All logic is dependent upon a series of selected assertions which are rooted within a sea of potentially selectable assertions. A computer cannot select which assertions to begin with.
2. All assertions are empty in themselves given they are dependent upon a progression to further assertions. This empty nature of the assertion is not programmable given the emptiness exists prior to computation. Computation is a byproduct of this empty nature but this emptiness is not programmable given emptiness is not programmable.
3. All assertions, as empty in themselves, are inherent middles to further assertions. This middle nature necessitates all assertions as center points to further assertions given the assertion leads to another assertion. Each assertion is a centerpoint and this nature of a centerpoint is not programmable.
4. Logic is thus rooted in a trifold nature: a chosen assertion, the emptiness of said assertion, and the assertion as a center point. This trifold nature to logic necessitates logic, at its roots, being unprogrammable.
A determination is the same thing as "choice function" in non-deterministic programming.
This ultimately boils down to the age old philosophical questions of determinism vs free will.
Neither of which precludes a programmer.
In quantum physics this is known as superdeterminism.
Free will results in confusion, confusion results in paradoxes and contradictions, something a computer cannot entertain.
Last edited by Eodnhoj7 on Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
The program is chosen.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:14 pm Yet the choice is determined by a subsidiary program. The program which determines which subsidiary program will be used cannot be chosen except by another program beyond it, and one beyond that. Telling the computer how to make a choice necessitates the computer as not being able to completely exert free will in choice.
The choice isn't.
If you want "completely free choice" - then choose to travel faster than the speed of light.
Re: Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
Free will (choice) results in imagination as the formation of possibilities from prior possibilities that are not normally linked together. As such free will results in confusion, confusion results contradiction and paradox, something a computer cannot entertain without shutting down the program. People however can operate on contradictions and paradoxes thus manifesting free will (choice).Skepdick wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:20 pmThe program is chosen.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:14 pm Yet the choice is determined by a subsidiary program. The program which determines which subsidiary program will be used cannot be chosen except by another program beyond it, and one beyond that. Telling the computer how to make a choice necessitates the computer as not being able to completely exert free will in choice.
The choice isn't.
If you want "completely free choice" - then choose to travel faster than the speed of light.
The manifestation of this free will exists through the creation of art. A computer cannot create art only replicate it. Given art is the new manifestation of how something occurs, ie the art of metal working, a computer cannot create a new "how" it can only exist through a "how".
Last edited by Eodnhoj7 on Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
That's not true. Anomalies, paradoxes, contradictions and errors happen all the time in programs.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:30 pm Free will (choice) results in imagination as the formation of possibilities from prior possibilities that are not normally linked together. As such free will results in confusion, confusion results contradiction and paradox, something a computer cannot entertain without shutting down the program. People however can operate on contradictions and paradoxes thus manifesting free will (choice).
And then the program handles those; or throws its hands up in the air and passes the problem onto another system.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_handling
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrupt
Re: Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
The manifestation of this free will exists through the creation of art, this art occurs through the manifestation of contradictions/paradoxes ie through the imagination. A computer cannot create art only replicate it as it cannot imagine new possibilities. Given art is the new manifestation of how something occurs, ie the art of metal working, a computer cannot create a new "how" it can only exist through a "how".Skepdick wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:38 pmThat's not true. Anomalies, paradoxes, contradictions and errors happen all the time in programs.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:30 pm Free will (choice) results in imagination as the formation of possibilities from prior possibilities that are not normally linked together. As such free will results in confusion, confusion results contradiction and paradox, something a computer cannot entertain without shutting down the program. People however can operate on contradictions and paradoxes thus manifesting free will (choice).
And then the program handles those; or throws its hands up in the air and passes the problem onto another system.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_handling
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrupt
The creation of contradiction/paradox, through imagination, is free will as choice.
Re: Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
Can a human create art or only replicate it by re-interpreting their own experiences?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:43 pm The manifestation of this free will exists through the creation of art, this art occurs through the manifestation of contradictions/paradoxes ie through the imagination. A computer cannot create art only replicate it as it cannot imagine new possibilities. Given art is the new manifestation of how something occurs, ie the art of metal working, a computer cannot create a new "how" it can only exist through a "how".
The creation of contradiction/paradox, through imagination, is free will as choice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03xMIcYiB80
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFkFf6Zu8i4
Re: Is logic at its root fundamentally programmable?
The combination of "x" assertions out of a sea of assertions, with assertions being the projection of a phenomenon, is relegated through choice. A program cannot pick "x" assertions out of a limitless expanse of assertions. The ever present "now" as the continuous change of experiences supplies a never ending range of assertions from which to pick. The reinterpretation of experience is the manifestation of free will. A computer cannot reinterpret 1+1=2 as equivocating to a variety of things, yet a human being can.Skepdick wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:45 pmCan a human create art or only replicate it by re-interpreting their own experiences?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:43 pm The manifestation of this free will exists through the creation of art, this art occurs through the manifestation of contradictions/paradoxes ie through the imagination. A computer cannot create art only replicate it as it cannot imagine new possibilities. Given art is the new manifestation of how something occurs, ie the art of metal working, a computer cannot create a new "how" it can only exist through a "how".
The creation of contradiction/paradox, through imagination, is free will as choice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03xMIcYiB80
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFkFf6Zu8i4