God Infinity

[bahman]

It's not based on any empirical data. (That is, the probability claims qua probability claims.)


???

Frequentist data. We'd need at least one iteration. We've not had an iteration of the entire history of the universe.

Are you talking about two iterations?

No, one. we've not had one iteration of the entire history of the universe. It's an ongoing project. We won't have the entire history until it's over.

Infinity+infinity=infinity therefore the whole+whole=whole. Voila, you have two iterations.

[Terrapin Station]

Are you talking about two iterations?

No, one. we've not had one iteration of the entire history of the universe. It's an ongoing project. We won't have the entire history until it's over.

Infinity+infinity=infinity therefore the whole+whole=whole. Voila, you have two iterations.

You mean you've finished infinity already?

[bahman]

No, one. we've not had one iteration of the entire history of the universe. It's an ongoing project. We won't have the entire history until it's over.

Infinity+infinity=infinity therefore the whole+whole=whole. Voila, you have two iterations.

You mean you've finished infinity already?

That is a property of infinity. I am not finishing anything.

[Terrapin Station]

Infinity+infinity=infinity therefore the whole+whole=whole. Voila, you have two iterations.

You mean you've finished infinity already?

That is a property of infinity. I am not finishing anything.

To have at least one iteration we need to have an entire history of the universe. Do we have that?

[bahman]

You mean you've finished infinity already?

That is a property of infinity. I am not finishing anything.

To have at least one iteration we need to have an entire history of the universe. Do we have that?

We are interested in the final stage. There is no final stage. The future is boundless.

[Terrapin Station]

That is a property of infinity. I am not finishing anything.

To have at least one iteration we need to have an entire history of the universe. Do we have that?

We are interested in the final stage. There is no final stage. The future is boundless.

So then the answer is "No," right?

[bahman]

To have at least one iteration we need to have an entire history of the universe. Do we have that?

We are interested in the final stage. There is no final stage. The future is boundless.

So then the answer is "No," right?

Yes, but what this has to do with the fact that everything is possible right now.

[Terrapin Station]

We are interested in the final stage. There is no final stage. The future is boundless.

So then the answer is "No," right?

Yes, but what this has to do with the fact that everything is possible right now.

I don't agree that there's any reason to believe that "everything is possible"

[bahman]

So then the answer is "No," right?

Yes, but what this has to do with the fact that everything is possible right now.

I don't agree that there's any reason to believe that "everything is possible"

Why not? The whole is boundless. Do you have any reason that there are no other realities?

[Terrapin Station]

Yes, but what this has to do with the fact that everything is possible right now.

I don't agree that there's any reason to believe that "everything is possible"

Why not? The whole is boundless. Do you have any reason that there are no other realities?

Boundlessness has nothing whatsoever to do with possibilities.

"Other realities" would have to be clarified.

[Eodnhoj7]

I don't agree that there's any reason to believe that "everything is possible"

Why not? The whole is boundless. Do you have any reason that there are no other realities?

Boundlessness has nothing whatsoever to do with possibilities.

"Other realities" would have to be clarified.

The boundlessness of possibilities is rooted in the ever changing nature of these possibilities.

[Terrapin Station]

Why not? The whole is boundless. Do you have any reason that there are no other realities?

Boundlessness has nothing whatsoever to do with possibilities.

"Other realities" would have to be clarified.

The boundlessness of possibilities is rooted in the ever changing nature of these possibilities.

"Boundless possibilities" would have something to do with possibilities, lol.

Is that what we switched to talking about instead of talking about the universe in general?

[bahman]

I don't agree that there's any reason to believe that "everything is possible"

Why not? The whole is boundless. Do you have any reason that there are no other realities?

Boundlessness has nothing whatsoever to do with possibilities.

It has. Think of life. The chance for having life in a larger universe is larger. That is obvious. Life simply has more opportunities to take place.

"Other realities" would have to be clarified.

Why not? Think of life. It is possible. I have contact with spiritual beings so I can clarify them.

[Eodnhoj7]

Boundlessness has nothing whatsoever to do with possibilities.

"Other realities" would have to be clarified.

The boundlessness of possibilities is rooted in the ever changing nature of these possibilities.

"Boundless possibilities" would have something to do with possibilities, lol.

Is that what we switched to talking about instead of talking about the universe in general?

The universe as ever changing is the universe as boundless given the ever changing possibilities. The universe and all it contains as boundless thus equates it to the definition of God as boundless.

[Terrapin Station]

It has. Think of life. The chance for having life in a larger universe is larger.

We went over this already. At some point you just gave up responding to the comments I was making.

"Other realities" would have to be clarified.

Why not? Think of life. It is possible. I have contact with spiritual beings so I can clarify them.

"Why not" is a weird response. So you're talking about "spiritual beings"? I don't buy that there are such things. (Though I'm a fan of the fantasy of it.)