Whatever claim of reality made by anyone, it must be grounded upon a Framework and System of Reality [FSR] or Knowledge [FSK].
Here is a case, where a claim of reality is made but Eodnhoj7 is clueless as to what FSR or FSK he is relying upon to arrive at his conclusion.
You have not answered my question.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 11, 2021 4:59 amAnd what is verifiable and justifiable empirically is all phenomenon are empty in themselves, this includes consciousness.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:00 amThe fact is what is real is what is verifiable and justifiable empirically and philosophically within a framework and system of knowledge [FSK].
The scientific FSK is the most credible and reliable in terms of representing reality.
What framework and system of knowledge are you relying on to verify and justify your conclusion, i.e. there is a real consciousness beyond all phenomena?
What framework and system of knowledge are you relying on to verify and justify your conclusion, i.e. there is a real consciousness beyond all phenomena?
Note this,
- For a scientist who claim 'Water is H2O' he will refer to the Scientific Framework and System [FSK] and the Chemistry FSK with its constitution and processes and requirements.
An astronomer will claim the Earth revolves round the Sun and not otherwise, he will refer to the Astronomical FSK.
For legal claims, one will refer to the legal FSK.
For geographical claims, one will refer to the geographical FSK.
Generally, all claims of facts are specific to their respective FSK.
What framework and system are you relying upon to arrive at the above conclusion?
Don't waste time thinking.
You are merely speculating the above conclusion without any FSK and grounds as driven by some terrible psychology.
The resultant conclusion therefrom is merely an illusion.
My Point:
Whatever claim of reality made by anyone, it must be grounded upon a Framework and System of Reality [FSR] or Knowledge [FSK].