a better Turing test
a better Turing test
As commonly understood, the Turing test might easily produce false positives. What is needed is the same test but with a philosopher, to provide false negatives. Call it the Turing Dialectic, if you will.
Re: a better Turing test
[quote=Harbal post_id=471822 time=1600372378 user_id=9107]
[quote=Advocate post_id=471820 time=1600371585 user_id=15238]
if you will.
[/quote]
I'll think about it. :|
[/quote]
Do it if you won't?
[quote=Advocate post_id=471820 time=1600371585 user_id=15238]
if you will.
[/quote]
I'll think about it. :|
[/quote]
Do it if you won't?
Re: a better Turing test
If you were chosen, what would your first question be?
"I'm a philosopher, and as such i believe the meaning of life is that everyone must choose the answer to that question for themselves. What's yours?"
"I'm a philosopher, and as such i believe the meaning of life is that everyone must choose the answer to that question for themselves. What's yours?"
Re: a better Turing test
It can produce false positives AND false negatives.
Are you an AI? I expect you to answer "No".
If we live in a simulation, that's a false negative.
Last edited by Skepdick on Thu Sep 17, 2020 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: a better Turing test
[quote=Harbal post_id=471827 time=1600373143 user_id=9107]
[quote=Advocate post_id=471823 time=1600372508 user_id=15238]
Do it if you won't?
[/quote]
I will only do it if I can't.
[/quote]
Prove it!
[quote=Advocate post_id=471823 time=1600372508 user_id=15238]
Do it if you won't?
[/quote]
I will only do it if I can't.
[/quote]
Prove it!
Re: a better Turing test
[quote=Skepdick post_id=471828 time=1600373247 user_id=17350]
[quote=Advocate post_id=471820 time=1600371585 user_id=15238]
As commonly understood, the Turing test might easily produce false positives.
[/quote]
It can produce false positives AND false negatives.
Are you an AI? I expect you to answer "No".
If we live in a simulation, then your answer is wrong.
[/quote]
How are you at producing false maybes? or no true positives?
[quote=Advocate post_id=471820 time=1600371585 user_id=15238]
As commonly understood, the Turing test might easily produce false positives.
[/quote]
It can produce false positives AND false negatives.
Are you an AI? I expect you to answer "No".
If we live in a simulation, then your answer is wrong.
[/quote]
How are you at producing false maybes? or no true positives?
Re: a better Turing test
[quote=Harbal post_id=471831 time=1600373373 user_id=9107]
[quote=Advocate post_id=471829 time=1600373261 user_id=15238]
Prove it!
[/quote]
What would you accept as proof?
[/quote]
Words or interpretive dance.
[quote=Advocate post_id=471829 time=1600373261 user_id=15238]
Prove it!
[/quote]
What would you accept as proof?
[/quote]
Words or interpretive dance.
Re: a better Turing test
[quote=Harbal post_id=471834 time=1600374190 user_id=9107]
[quote=Skepdick post_id=471833 time=1600373740 user_id=17350]
How's a false maybe different to a true maybe?
[/quote]
A true maybe maybe a maybe, but a false maybe has no possibility of being a maybe.
[/quote]
Hmm
.. perhaps.
[quote=Skepdick post_id=471833 time=1600373740 user_id=17350]
How's a false maybe different to a true maybe?
[/quote]
A true maybe maybe a maybe, but a false maybe has no possibility of being a maybe.
[/quote]
Hmm
.. perhaps.
Re: a better Turing test
[quote=Harbal post_id=471843 time=1600375621 user_id=9107]
[quote=Advocate post_id=471839 time=1600375137 user_id=15238]
Hmm
.. perhaps.
[/quote]
That looks like a false perhaps.
[/quote]
Is that a belief or is it knowledge? I believe it's neither, but i don't know.
[quote=Advocate post_id=471839 time=1600375137 user_id=15238]
Hmm
.. perhaps.
[/quote]
That looks like a false perhaps.
[/quote]
Is that a belief or is it knowledge? I believe it's neither, but i don't know.