Me neither / and it shows / but it does, unfortunately, cause you showed it to me, for one thing. (And that is not a bad thing as mentioned before! I even vow genuinely to you for it with much gratitude, compassion and love towards you and your expression!),Nick_A wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 11:13 pmi am not a Buddhist /so Allan watts has limited appeal for me. /It doesn't answer why we Are here or the potential for human being.NEW wrote: ↑Wed May 06, 2020 10:37 pm I guess this meeting is adjourned
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFrdqQZ8FFc
Can you consider, in all seriousness this time, and self reflect a while,
upon the possibility you may be so much lost and involved into the seriousness of your act, you don't realize it yourself, that it is just an act, away from your true self?
This due to conditioning factors, beyond one's comprehension, entangled so much with the ego ao factors so that the illusion becomes, like it's part of one self, and therefore generates this reality? (you wanted a possible insight to all this suffering, and possible solutions)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdzPp9cRKN0
Anyway, we can yadieyadie on and on about this,
meeting's adjourned
you are you,
I am me,
and we both might disagree
and that is fine, even more so, even better
It's called the "UNity within diversity" I'm questioning and scouting upon it's potential relevance,
and it showing relevance, partly thanks to you, so you have my gratitude