1. Deduction has been been heavily accredited to development by Aristotle and as such exists as a perspective originating with him along the manner of Neitzches perspectivism.
2. Perspectivism observes the continual atomization and progression of one perspective into another perspective where perspective alone follows the same form and function of deduction.
3. This progression of one perspective to another, through deduction as "deduction", necessitates a linear branching of perspectives as being grounded in base platonic forms. Deduction is grounded in linear progression and connection thus exists through Platonic forms.
4. Platonic forms exist as perspectives, considering the connection and seperation of perspectives and the axioms which form the perspectives (as perspectives in themselves), are the process through which man reflects in a socratic sense. One axiom repeating into another, as one perspective repeating into another, necessitates perspective as dynamic rational forms.
5. These forms, grounded in Platonism, exist as primordial structures of consciousness within man from a jungian interpretation. The socratic notion of blank slate is strictly a reflection of Socrates dialogues with phaedrus observing the gods (platonic forms) stemming from a formless "one" (blanck slate of the mind).
Each axiom as a set of connected and disconnected forms is equivalent to a God as the anthroporphization of inherent axiom base which guides the nature of man. The blank slate, or formless "one" through which the God's gather and "feast from", is the assumptive nature of the mind itself as a blanck slate or "voidness" in the eastern tradition. Each axiom, as a God, thus exists as a thought projection that guides the individuals life much in a similar manner to the eastern concept of "the tulpa"
6. Deduction is the perspective of reducing perspective to this core base which can no longer be reduced, thus has an antithetical element to that of accumulating axioms as evidential through induction. Deduction and induction thus are the base interplaying perspectives, represented by the forms of Apollo Order and dionysus chaos of neitzche.
Deduction as disorderly can be observed as a continual breaking apart of reality to get to its base form, such as the dionysian orgies where intended to do to the psyches of the participatory. Induction, as the creation of evidence through the connection of axioms as the formation of axioms observes this dual interplay.
7. This interplay of perspectives, as grounded in connected and disconnected axioms, necessitates all perspectives as inherent forms that constitute a symbolic nature, with the symbol acting as an intermediary. Thus perspectives as platonic forms are symbolic where the nature of awareness is grounded in its own objectivity...in simpler terms each perspective as a platonic form is an object thus takes an on symbolic nature conducive to wittgenstein language games where the perspective exists as not just a language which occurs in an interplaying dialogue of being but effectively is dynamically changing.
8. Each perspective as dynamic change necessitates a hersclitian response where just as "no person steps into the same river twice" so does no perspective exists in the same manner.
9. Each perspective as continually changing observes an inherent form of presocratic atomism where just as one axiom progress to another so does each perspective further observing that each perspective as changing is simultaneously a boundary of change...thus cycling back to a base platonic form. Each axiom as a boundary of change, where each axiom is a form through which the perspective dynamically individuates itself in a jungian sense as aristotelian actualization, is this a constant.
9. Perspectives through perspectives, axioms through axioms, being through being as form through form, necessitates all perspective as being in a state of superposition through the recursion of each perspective respectively as fractal perspectives. Each perspective is composed and composed kf further perspective through its progressive deductive atomizing as well as its movement towards a whole through its negation of deductivity (negation of negation as deductivity is negation) under inductive wholism.
10. This constant unchanging nature of linear deductivity and inductivity as constituting the psyche, observes the static nature of platonic forms as ever present within the reasoning processes of the psyche being the self reflective unchanging whole of parmenides with there percievably multiplicitous nature being grounded in the Presocratic atomists.
11. The respective dualism between the atomists and wholists observes an inherent synthetic approach of Hegel as a dual to Neitzhe, where the percievably various number of perspectives as atomism show a constant and repeated form of linear continuums through which the respective perspective connects and separates assumptions. Thus the "atoms in void" of the atomists are equivalent to the perspective itself and represents a jungian projection of there own psyche. The constant form of the perspectives linear continuums necessitates all atomism as effectively being the same form repeatedly recursively with this recursion taking on the same linear form it is repeating. Thus atomism necessitates a wholism where parmenides projects one constant underlying unchanging form to reality.
12. This form is grounded in the apriori nature of kants metaphysics by observing the blanck slate of socrates as fundamentally a single point of awareness. This single point of awareness from which "the gods the drink from" are now not just jungian Archetypes in the pscyhe but as as embodiments of axioms which we ourselves personify thus equating "man as measurer".
13. This blanck slate, recursively occurring in all of man's grounding of awareness, is the assumptive capacity of man himself from which all axioms he is aware of are sustained by assumption alone much in the same manner Socrates talkes abouts the Gods (which effectively are localizations of this one formless through many assumption that take a form).
14. The history of philosophy thus becomes it's own perspective subject to it's own rules as the progression of one assumed point to another further reflecting that deductivity and conductivity, as the linear continuum of points of awareness, is grounded in heidegers base notion of time as a lije between two points...with these points representing the blanck slate assumptive nature of consciousness as perspective being a reflection of the one universal boundless assumption of "all" in which man is a recursive image of.
15. The end.