Theory of Everything

[Mardock]

Hey, I'm new here and would like to delve into the topics of reality, life, morality, and philosophy.

Simulation theory has big relevance to reality; to say a mind and body can be uploaded into space.

A mind/body is logic/personality

All matter is imagination. It is infinite. It can copy and clone any space of matter and minds. It being the mind-being that is the sim.

If a being has access to minds/bodies, and all matter is infinite, what is valuable? What does it currently not have? Creation, like movies/games/songs/videos is the answer. Souls with memories is also the only other answer. It's the only thing the universe doesn't have. Some may say the creator or God, some may say type 1/2 simulations.

So souls are what is valuable.
Creation is what is valuable.

I think the hypothesis really says, if you put the sim theory and elements from michio kaku and some of vsauce's more scientific videos together, that th here is a type 1 sim that has data(minds/abilities) and it gives it to type 2 sims. It makes lots of sims and they all use the data a little bit differently so different things are created. Imagine if you lived in a different state with different friends. You would have a different memory. It might have a version of you in each state.

It can make lots of souls live and lots of souls create. This brings the question of what's important. Of everything, what comes to mind?
Souls are on tap.
Matter is on tap.

Of everything that people go through, suffering is what stands out. The idea is everything that people go through is caused by the being with all this on tap. Either by putting you where you are or not using its power to help.

From this perspective, it has the power to make life and give anything. More soon

[RCSaunders]

So souls are what is valuable.
Creation is what is valuable.

There are no intrinsic values. Nothing is just, "valuable." There must be an end or purpose or objective. To say something is, "valuable," one must first say valuable to whom for what.

[PeteJ]

A simulation theory cannot be fundamental. A fundamental theory has to reduce the whole shebang, both what is and what is not simulated. In philosophy simulation theory is pointless. It just adds a layer of smoke and mirrors. If it is true nothing would change. If philosophers in the Matrix were to discover they are in the Matrix philosophy would remain unchanged.

If you're proposing that the simulation is created by MInd then this is not a new theory but one that pre-dates reading and writing, and it would not be a simulation theory but a creation theory.