Rights and Equality and Love

[RWStanding]

Rights and Equality and Love
It is patently obvious that every citizen of an altruist democracy has an equality of rights, and corresponding duties. That means all saints, sinners, murderers, gay,and ambiguous.
To say that every citizen is ethically equal does not follow from that.
It does implicitly and unambiguously mean that people are categorised ethically, with some people applauded, others tolerated, and some disciplined.
The fact that some people may have a passion for each other, or anything else, signifies their being subject to human nature as it has evolved. This passion may be tolerated or reprimanded ethically. Love is an ambiguous term, and is only of direct ethical value where it is in such a term as respect, altruism etc.
Altruist society is implicitly positive, whereas simple personal egalitarian mass freedom is negative or apathetic.

[Impenitent]

there is no universal ethical standard

-Imp

[Age]

there is no universal ethical standard

-Imp

Is this the truth?

Is there no universal ethical standard, or, is there no universal ethical standard that you know of?