Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Tell me a universally agreed upon interpretation of "science", "evidence" and "proof"...I don't want others to miss what religious dogmatist you are.
I've already told you you loon, there can be no 'universally' agreed anything, that is for metaphysical loons like yourself but what there is is a general agreement as to what we can intersubjectively agree upon and that is experimental science and what that involves is at base the ability to replicate another's experiments, something your dowsers and 'pyramid wizards' are incapable of achieving and as such are basically full of shit.
Save the science book thumping and your ritual sacrifices on the laboratory tables of sciences as "offering proof for our salvation" fanaticism. It's delusional.
The only delusional loon here is you as you are so wrapped-up in your metaphysic that you cannot grasp what it is the natual philosophers did(and please do not repeat the claim that the ancients were as such as they weren't) and that was to destroy metaphysicians such as you. Hence you cannot even reproduce the results from your 'experiments' and resort to all this waffle and bullshit about 'science' when any Philosopher of Science knows there is no such thing as 'Science' just the subjects that use the experimental method. The only reason why you produce all this waffle is that you are unable to achieve in the subjects of the time but think yourself a much maligned 'genius' but if you were then you'd be able to at least achieve in the last subject available to such as you, Philosophy. But its quite clear that you also unable to get to grips with this subject as well as you are unwilling to learn from anyone and so have taught yourself piecemeal but because you have already decided what is the case you have only found what supports you and have not engaged in what Philosophy has become which is critique and especially self-critique. Now for all I know you may well be the next Hegel(you're certainly impenetrable enough) but you will never be as such, as even he understood that you have to have read what has been said previously and you are too up your own arse or even psychological incapable of facing critique of your ideas and amending them, me I think it because you are a loon but maybe it's just that you are actually dumber than you think you are. Not that I care as with your insistence on claiming that the Egyptians built the pyramids with dowsing rods and that the Russians have show that pyraminds cure aids, mental illness, improve crop yields,, etc, etc and that you can detect EM fields with your dowsing rods but are unwilling to prove it with a few basic experimental methods you have shown youself to be a compete and utter nut-job.
Toodles.