Which Ultimate Truths Can Be Proven "Beyond a Reasonable Doubt"?

[gaffo]

Then again I will suggest you have nothing on which to build a philosophy,

i agree.

I was willing to lay out my basic premises, simply and in plain English. Why dont you?

I did, I'm a Solipsist, and have been since age 16 - 37 yrs ago.

Because you cant.

i have many times. no need to be flippant.

If you accept nothing external to yourself as real, you are left with pretty much nothing.

I'm left with what is "real" via empiricism - all things i know are "real" via my consciousness - whether what i know of "Reality/history/science/world/you" - actually exist outside of me is irrelivent and unknowable by me.

Instead, all I hear you say is that my premises are bullshit. Yet they are perfectly reasonable to anyone who has read the beginners book by Russell.

Russel is not god - use you own mind.

Descarte came to my conclusion as a 20 something (5 yrs older than me, who i did not know of as a 16 yr old Solipsist) - before he bask-slid into Christian nonesence, and started affirming faith in reality beyond himself.

Well, except my third premise, if someone wants to inanely argue that a rock sees self-worth in itself, as I state that the concept of value, or valuation, belongs to awareness, and concept itself as well, conceptualization being a mental process.

??

[Dalek Prime]

Then again I will suggest you have nothing on which to build a philosophy,

i agree.

I was willing to lay out my basic premises, simply and in plain English. Why dont you?

I did, I'm a Solipsist, and have been since age 16 - 37 yrs ago.

Because you cant.

i have many times. no need to be flippant.

If you accept nothing external to yourself as real, you are left with pretty much nothing.

I'm left with what is "real" via empiricism - all things i know are "real" via my consciousness - whether what i know of "Reality/history/science/world/you" - actually exist outside of me is irrelivent and unknowable by me.

Instead, all I hear you say is that my premises are bullshit. Yet they are perfectly reasonable to anyone who has read the beginners book by Russell.

Russel is not god - use you own mind.

Descarte came to my conclusion as a 20 something (5 yrs older than me, who i did not know of as a 16 yr old Solipsist) - before he bask-slid into Christian nonesence, and started affirming faith in reality beyond himself.

Well, except my third premise, if someone wants to inanely argue that a rock sees self-worth in itself, as I state that the concept of value, or valuation, belongs to awareness, and concept itself as well, conceptualization being a mental process.

??

I knew you didn't read them all. There were only three.

[Logik]

The best way to cure solipsism is a swift knee to the testicles, followed my a reminder that the realness of my knee is unknowable and irrelevant.

Solipsists, theists, atheists, skepticist, rationalists, empiricist, realist, existentialist and every other -ist out there is likely to guard their family jewels every time I get within knee-range.