Is trokanmariel a bot?

[mickthinks]

Is trokanmariel a bot? And by "bot" I mean it usually goes like this, perfect female in a business suit means that God cannot find the exit.

[henry quirk]

.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

I think you might be right. At first I thought Trixie had returned.

[surreptitious57]

He is not Trixie because she did not know he was a man [ he posted as shellytrokan over at the other place ]

[HexHammer]

The real tragic part is that retards tries to have a normal debate with "it/him/her" but it actually seems highly likely that it's a bot under trials testing it's philosophical abilities, which utterly fails.

[commonsense]

But it is well known that a bot cannot be the embodiment of a male or a female and only by acknowledging this can we become better bodily for it it has always been with us since the beginning of time, which we all know is not real. Furthermore when the Union Jack has been unfurled below the skull and crossbones it further reinforces my point.

[-1-]

I think you might be right. At first I thought Trixie had returned.

All along I've always thought YOU are Trixie.

[-1-]

Is trokanmariel a bot? And by "bot" I mean it usually goes like this, perfect female in a business suit means that God cannot find the exit.

I've been rather keen on the opinion that TimeSeeker is a student of sorts, trying his wings at confusing people. TS may be a philosophy major, a law student, or a drop-out of either discipline. S/He is bitter, s/he hates the world, and mostly s/he hates him/herself.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

I think you might be right. At first I thought Trixie had returned.

All along I've always thought YOU are Trixie.

Stupid.

[-1-]

I think you might be right. At first I thought Trixie had returned.

All along I've always thought YOU are Trixie.

Stupid.

No.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

All along I've always thought YOU are Trixie.

Stupid.

No.

Yes it is. You're an idiot with evidently no reading comprehension skills.

[-1-]

Stupid.

No.

Yes it is. You're an idiot with evidently no reading comprehension skills.

That may be YOUR impression. Have you ever given thought to the possibility that your impression may be wrong in this aspect?

Or maybe your impression and responses are EXACTLY like those of TRIXIE's: full of venom, hurt, and unfounded accusations.

And then you are wondering why others call you irresponsibly quick-to-anger, and why others compare you to TRIXIE.

It's time you took an inventory of your responses on these boards, and not close the books once you put your words down. Go back, read your responses, and THEN judge for yourself if you and TRIXIE have many things in common or not, or you and TRIXIE have MAJOR character traits in common.

Nuff said.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

No.

Yes it is. You're an idiot with evidently no reading comprehension skills.

That may be YOUR impression. Have you ever given thought to the possibility that your impression may be wrong in this aspect?

Or maybe your impression and responses are EXACTLY like those of TRIXIE's: full of venom, hurt, and unfounded accusations.

And then you are wondering why others call you irresponsibly quick-to-anger, and why others compare you to TRIXIE.

It's time you took an inventory of your responses on these boards, and not close the books once you put your words down. Go back, read your responses, and THEN judge for yourself if you and TRIXIE have many things in common or not, or you and TRIXIE have MAJOR character traits in common.

Nuff said.

What do you mean 'others'? Who are you speaking for? And would you care to post some of our comments side by side and explain why you think we are the same person? I thought not

[vegetariantaxidermy]

No.

Yes it is. You're an idiot with evidently no reading comprehension skills.

That may be YOUR impression. Have you ever given thought to the possibility that your impression may be wrong in this aspect?

Or maybe your impression and responses are EXACTLY like those of TRIXIE's: full of venom, hurt, and unfounded accusations.

And then you are wondering why others call you irresponsibly quick-to-anger, and why others compare you to TRIXIE.

It's time you took an inventory of your responses on these boards, and not close the books once you put your words down. Go back, read your responses, and THEN judge for yourself if you and TRIXIE have many things in common or not, or you and TRIXIE have MAJOR character traits in common.

Nuff said.

Lets say a baby could shoot lasers out of its eyes. baby grows up to be a man. What kind of lame super power is that? You couldn't get away with crimes or anything, shooting lasers from eyes is basically like having a gun permanently glued to your hand. It would be a super lame superpower. Basically the only power is it would make muggers afraid to attack you and women afraid to date you because you could accidentally chop them in half. It would be the lamest superpower in the world.

At most you could use it to get a job as a sideshow, but then once the public accepts it as a "fact" people would lose interest and you'd lose your job. And this is what i mean. Truth is accepted as "truth" once it slowly becomes a fact in public eye. This is how our brains work. We evolved as social animals and this is how we detect if something is "true". If I told you, that I knew a baby that could shoot lasers out of its eyes, you would think Im lying and making it up. But if this baby was a side show, and millions and billions of people attended the circus, saw it shoot lasers, and it was in the news, then it would become a "truth" and i would believe that babies could shoot lasers out of its eyes.

and this is the flaw of the human brain, and how religion infects itself in society. the human brain has a flaw that, the only way it detects truth is through public majority opinion. since the majority of the public believes in religion, we assume that religion has some truth to it. this is the way the human social brain operates, and it is a flaw of the brain's system. For example, if I proved magic, or ufos are real, but the majority believes it is false, lets say 1 person sees a UFO and ufos are actually real, but people will say UFOs are a fake lie because, ufos dont have public majority approval.

I see what you mean. This looks EXACTLY like something I would write.
And since (I think) you are American I will need to point out that that is sarcasm

[Eodnhoj7]

The real tragic part is that retards tries to have a normal debate with "it/him/her" but it actually seems highly likely that it's a bot under trials testing it's philosophical abilities, which utterly fails.

Actually the questions, however retarded they appear, are highly intelligent.