what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

daramantus
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:44 pm

what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by daramantus » Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:10 pm

no one for him/her to answer, something? nah, no thing ! the posts she reads is happening out of the blue, and appears to her in his house out of nowhere.... his/her religion of "no thing" and "nothing" makes no sense
moron.jpg
moron.jpg (20.13 KiB) Viewed 375 times

User avatar
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by Eodnhoj7 » Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:21 pm

Hypocrite

daramantus: "There is no unified nature anywhere. And if you use this number analogy, you're also wrong. It starts with ZERO..."

Last edited by daramantus on Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=23164



The next point you will probably say is: "But I was arguing for multiplicity".

To which my response would be: "But it starts with zero, and physics argues everything is moving to point zero as nothing is infinite."

daramantus
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:44 pm

Re: what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by daramantus » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:25 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:21 pm
Hypocrite

daramantus: "There is no unified nature anywhere. And if you use this number analogy, you're also wrong. It starts with ZERO..."

Last edited by daramantus on Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=23164



The next point you will probably say is: "But I was arguing for multiplicity".

To which my response would be: "But it starts with zero, and physics argues everything is moving to point zero as nothing is infinite."
The argument of nothing is not mine, I was arguing that multiplicity is the truth, however space is empty, when there are objects and distance, there is space. that's all. that has nothing to do with what dontaskme is talking about

User avatar
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by Eodnhoj7 » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:28 pm

daramantus wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:25 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:21 pm
Hypocrite

daramantus: "There is no unified nature anywhere. And if you use this number analogy, you're also wrong. It starts with ZERO..."

Last edited by daramantus on Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=23164



The next point you will probably say is: "But I was arguing for multiplicity".


To which my response would be: "But it starts with zero, and physics argues everything is moving to point zero as nothing is infinite."
The argument of nothing is not mine, I was arguing that multiplicity is the truth, however space is empty, when there are objects and distance, there is space. that's all. that has nothing to do with what dontaskme is talking about

daramantus
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:44 pm

Re: what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by daramantus » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:31 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:28 pm
daramantus wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:25 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:21 pm
Hypocrite

daramantus: "There is no unified nature anywhere. And if you use this number analogy, you're also wrong. It starts with ZERO..."

Last edited by daramantus on Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=23164



The next point you will probably say is: "But I was arguing for multiplicity".


To which my response would be: "But it starts with zero, and physics argues everything is moving to point zero as nothing is infinite."
The argument of nothing is not mine, I was arguing that multiplicity is the truth, however space is empty, when there are objects and distance, there is space. that's all. that has nothing to do with what dontaskme is talking about
EMPTY SPACE IS NOTHING, I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT EMPTY SPACE. OBJECTS HAVE THEIR OWN SUBSTANCE, YOU HAVE YOUR OWN CONSCIOUSNESS, THAT'S THE MYSTERY. 0 , 1 , 2 ..... 1 is not nothing, it's something. I'm not arguing about ZERO (mystery)

User avatar
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by Eodnhoj7 » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:34 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:28 pm
daramantus wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:25 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:21 pm
Hypocrite

daramantus: "There is no unified nature anywhere. And if you use this number analogy, you're also wrong. It starts with ZERO..."

Last edited by daramantus on Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=23164



The next point you will probably say is: "But I was arguing for multiplicity".


To which my response would be: "But it starts with zero, and physics argues everything is moving to point zero as nothing is infinite."
The argument of nothing is not mine, I was arguing that multiplicity is the truth, however space is empty, when there are objects and distance, there is space. that's all. that has nothing to do with what dontaskme is talking about

daramantus
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:44 pm

Re: what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by daramantus » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:36 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:34 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:28 pm
daramantus wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:25 pm


The argument of nothing is not mine, I was arguing that multiplicity is the truth, however space is empty, when there are objects and distance, there is space. that's all. that has nothing to do with what dontaskme is talking about
nothing is nothing.
infinity doesn't exist.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/ ... g-physics/
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/ ... g-physics/
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/ ... g-physics/
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/ ... g-physics/
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/ ... g-physics/
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/ ... g-physics/
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/ ... g-physics/

if you can't get over it, I feel sorry for you.
Last edited by daramantus on Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

daramantus
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:44 pm

Re: what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by daramantus » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:39 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:34 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:28 pm
daramantus wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:25 pm


The argument of nothing is not mine, I was arguing that multiplicity is the truth, however space is empty, when there are objects and distance, there is space. that's all. that has nothing to do with what dontaskme is talking about
So do you agree with dontaskme, where no one argue with no one about nothing and anything? If so, you're a lost case

User avatar
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by Eodnhoj7 » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:40 pm

But that means something exists eternally. Otherwise if it does not exist eternally, there is eventually nothingness and substance does not really exist. How if it does continually exist, in different forms, then that means it is continual and never is reduced to nothingness; i.e. "eternal".
Last edited by Eodnhoj7 on Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by Eodnhoj7 » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:41 pm

daramantus wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:39 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:34 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:28 pm
So do you agree with dontaskme, where no one argue with no one about nothing and anything? If so, you're a lost case
I don't agree with you questioning why people are here when the arguments you make are equally faulty.

daramantus
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:44 pm

Re: what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by daramantus » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:46 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:40 pm
But that means something exists eternally. Otherwise if it does not exist eternally, there is eventually nothingness and substance does not really exist. How if it does continually exist, in different forms, then that means it is continually and never is reduced to nothingness; i.e. "eternal".
Ok, I'll take your argument. If something produced something, then that something is not something, but some being with consciousness, some being behind, not "continually" but stable, it's there, it was there, can't be reduced to nothing, it may be eternal , ok. However, objects, are not eternal, a body is not imortal, what could be is the soul, who knows??
What I don't agree is about the confusion about something and nothing, and the misuse of the words propagated by dontaskme, if you know what I mean, no one argues with no one, no one perceives the nothing and someone who thinks is someone arguing with someone who thinks it's no one, and nothing really happened..............
Last edited by daramantus on Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

daramantus
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:44 pm

Re: what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by daramantus » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:48 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:41 pm
daramantus wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:39 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:34 pm
So do you agree with dontaskme, where no one argue with no one about nothing and anything? If so, you're a lost case
I don't agree with you questioning why people are here when the arguments you make are equally faulty.
Do you agree that you are the perceiver, or do you agree with dontaskme that you are a "no one" perceiving others?

User avatar
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by Eodnhoj7 » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:49 pm

daramantus wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:46 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:40 pm
But that means something exists eternally. Otherwise if it does not exist eternally, there is eventually nothingness and substance does not really exist. How if it does continually exist, in different forms, then that means it is continually and never is reduced to nothingness; i.e. "eternal".
Ok, I'll take your argument. If something produced something, then that something is not something, but a consciousness, some being behind, not "continually" but stable, it's there, it was there, can't be reduced to nothing, it may be eternal , ok.
But you said infinity cannot exist because it can't be proven.

However, objects, are not eternal, a body is not imortal, what could be is the soul, who knows??
What I don't agree is about the confusion about something and nothing, and the misuse of the words propagated by dontaskme, if you know what I mean, no one argues with no one, no one perceives the nothing and someone who thinks is someone arguing with someone who thinks it's no one, and nothing really happened..............
The observation of nothingness is the observation of acausal relations through multiple particulate (or your fields). Don't ask me is simple observe the relativistic side of metaphysics, physics, ethics, etc.

User avatar
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by Eodnhoj7 » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:51 pm

daramantus wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:48 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:41 pm
daramantus wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:39 pm


So do you agree with dontaskme, where no one argue with no one about nothing and anything? If so, you're a lost case
I don't agree with you questioning why people are here when the arguments you make are equally faulty.
Do you agree that you are the perceiver, or do you agree with dontaskme that you are a "no one" perceiving others?
Both at the same time in different respects. Perception is an empty vessel, the vessel exists as a thing in itself while simultaneously, in a different respect consists of "emptiness" or "nothingness".

daramantus
Posts: 109
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:44 pm

Re: what is dontaskme doing in the forum?

Post by daramantus » Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:52 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:51 pm
daramantus wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:48 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:41 pm


I don't agree with you questioning why people are here when the arguments you make are equally faulty.
Do you agree that you are the perceiver, or do you agree with dontaskme that you are a "no one" perceiving others?
Both at the same time in different respects. Perception is an empty vessel, the vessel exists as a thing in itself while simultaneously, in a different respect consists of "emptiness" or "nothingness".
Perception requires a perceiver, which is not something in a vessel, it's a perceiver looking from inside to ouside.
nothingness, emptiness, these are new-agey neo advaita jargons, I'm not interested

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests