"freewill"

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

The Inglorious One
Posts: 593
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2015 8:25 pm

Re: "freewill"

Post by The Inglorious One »

alpha wrote: there is no such thing as randomness (actual randomness).
Of course. That's exactly what "randomness (freedom) and necessity do not exist independently" implies.

Hobbes either:
  • 1) lives in an alternate universe in which 19th century physics still prospers,
    2) is willfully ignorant,
    3) is a troll whose only purpose is to disrupt, or
    4) some combination of the above.
User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8364
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: "freewill"

Post by Hobbes' Choice »

The Inglorious One wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote: Nothing is atemporal, except concepts that do no work and have no extension.
Does reality have a beginning? Do either randomness or necessity have a beginning?

Why are you avoiding the question?
User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8364
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: "freewill"

Post by Hobbes' Choice »

The Inglorious One wrote:
alpha wrote: there is no such thing as randomness (actual randomness).
Of course. That's exactly what "randomness (freedom) and necessity do not exist independently" implies.

Hobbes either:
  • 1) lives in an alternate universe in which 19th century physics still prospers,
    2) is willfully ignorant,
    3) is a troll whose only purpose is to disrupt, or
    4) some combination of the above.
You forget 5) A deluded religious nut living in the 1stC BC.

Please explain how Heisenberg relates to the question.
The Inglorious One
Posts: 593
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2015 8:25 pm

Re: "freewill"

Post by The Inglorious One »

Hobbes' Choice wrote: Please explain how Heisenberg relates to the question.
Heisenberg came upon the uncertainty principle by thinking there might be a reality that is not discoverable by experiment or explained by mathematical formalities.

This might hurt your 19th century head, but more and more, the universe in which we live appears to be a “holomovement"-- a term coined by physicist David Bohm but an idea that goes back centuries.

The random movements of the infinitesimal are linked by the oneness of infinity. Einstein called it "spooky action at a distance." There is no “substantive” will, no will that stands apart from dynamic whole. Ideally, what we call “freewill” is the act of a concentrated region of dominant characteristics progressively making adjustments to the constant movement of the Whole through conscious and unconscious awareness coexisting on multifarious levels of connectedness.

I say "ideally" because yours, being stuck in the 19th century, might be a hopeless case.
User avatar
Hobbes' Choice
Posts: 8364
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am

Re: "freewill"

Post by Hobbes' Choice »

The Inglorious One wrote:
Hobbes' Choice wrote: Please explain how Heisenberg relates to the question.
Heisenberg came upon the uncertainty principle by thinking there might be a reality that is not discoverable by experiment or explained by mathematical formalities.

This might hurt your 19th century head, but more and more, the universe in which we live appears to be a “holomovement"-- a term coined by physicist David Bohm but an idea that goes back centuries.

The random movements of the infinitesimal are linked by the oneness of infinity. Einstein called it "spooky action at a distance." There is no “substantive” will, no will that stands apart from dynamic whole. Ideally, what we call “freewill” is the act of a concentrated region of dominant characteristics progressively making adjustments to the constant movement of the Whole through conscious and unconscious awareness coexisting on multifarious levels of connectedness.

I say "ideally" because yours, being stuck in the 19th century, might be a hopeless case.
Please answer the question.
Post Reply