Lacewing wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2021 3:04 am
Age wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2021 1:18 am...
You do not know what people see and think based on your bizarre interpretations of communication.
AND HERE is a PRIME EXAMPLE of one who makes CLAIMS, but, when challenged, is NEVER able to back up nor support those CLAIMS. Which, I will once again, PROVE is True.
You CLAIM that I do NOT KNOW what people see and think, based on my "bizarre interpretations of communication". Now, what, to you, is my "bizarre interpretation of communication".
And, how do you KNOW that I DO NOT KNOW what people see and think? (Are 'you' NOT YET AWARE that the words that 'you', people, use CLEARLY SHOWS and REVEALS what 'you', people see and think?)
Lacewing wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2021 3:04 am
You are usually way off base,
Also, just using words like, "bizarre interpretation of communication", does NOT mean there is an ACTUAL "bizarre interpretation of communication". There, however, may be an EXTREME "bizarre interpretation of communication", TO YOU, but until you provide ANY actual example, and explanation, then what you are CLAIMING here is just ALL in that head ONLY.
Now, CLAIMING that I am "usually way off base", AGAIN, without providing ANY examples NOR explanations, is nothing more than just YOUR OWN INTERPRETATION, which is, again, sitting with in that head ONLY.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2021 3:04 am
and if someone points that out to you, you make excuses and even more projections.
Just because 'you', supposedly, "point out things", does NOT mean that what you "point out" is even remotely close to being the truth. AND, especially considering the FACT that what you CLAIM is "pointing out" is just saying, ridiculous, and absurd things like; "you are usually way off base", "you do not know what people see or think based on your bizarre interpretation of communication", and/or "you make excuses and even more projections" WITHOUT EVER adding ANY thing more is NOT "pointing 'that' out to me".
That is just you expressing your OWN ASSUMPTIONS and BELIEFS, without ANY thing being provided to back up and support those ASSUMPTIONS nor BELIEFS.
For example, what you CLAIM is "my bizarre interpretation of communication" could IN FACT just be YOUR OWN 'bizarre interpretation'. But, because you do NOT provide ANY ACTUAL 'thing' to LOOK AT and DISCUSS 'we' will NEVER KNOW what thee ACTUAL Truth IS here.
If, and when, 'you' EVER get up to the COURAGE to PROVIDE ACTUAL PROOF for your CLAIMS, then 'we' can LOOK AT just how Correct or Incorrect 'you' REALLY ARE.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Sat Jun 12, 2021 3:04 am
You are being too ridiculous to engage with.
LOL
And 'you' just MAKE CLAIMS but NEVER provide ANY PROOF for those CLAIMS, so there is, literally, NOTHING to 'engage with'.
For example, I could just as easily say, and claim:
"You do not know what you are talking about based on your bizarre interpretations of communication." And, then do what you do, and just expect 'you', the "other", to just accept and agree with this being true.
I could then also just as easily say, and claim:
"You are usually way off base, and if someone points that out to you, you make excuses and even more projections." And, again, then do what you do, and just expect 'you', the "other", to just accept and agree with this being true.
I could then just as easily say, and claim:
"You are being too ridiculous to engage with." And, then again, do what you do, and just expect 'you', the "other", to just accept and agree with this being true.
BUT, the difference, however, between if and when 'you' say and claim these things and if and when I were to say and claim these things is that I can ACTUALLY back up and support those claims, and therefore could ACTUALLY PROVE what I have said and claimed, about 'you'. AND, if 'you' would like to CHALLENGE me on this FACT, then PLEASE go right on ahead.